IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v26y1988i3p279-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress research: Its present status and issues for future developments

Author

Listed:
  • Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M.
  • Marcelissen, F. H. G.

Abstract

In this article the contribution of nine approaches to stress research is discussed. These approaches are: (1) the biological approach; (2) the (classic) psychosomatic approach; (3) the life event approach; (4) interactionistic or transactional approaches; (5) life style and behavior; (6) group differences; (7) sociocultural (macro-)factors; (8) work and organizational psychology; and (9) intervention and prevention. It is concluded that, more and more, exchanges take place between different approaches and that the willingness to collaborate increases. Not only do we observe collaboration between different disciplines, there also are examples of an integration of laboratory research and field research. In addition, interest of animal workers for human research and vice versa seems to increase. Although it is realized that stress research has its own inherent characteristic problems (e.g. ethics), the authors feel that the future still can bring important progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. & Marcelissen, F. H. G., 1988. "Stress research: Its present status and issues for future developments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 279-291, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:3:p:279-291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90392-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:3:p:279-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.