IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v26y1988i2p265-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immunization coverage of children in a semi-urban village panchayat in Nepal, 1985

Author

Listed:
  • Ahluwalia, Indu B.
  • Helgerson, Steven D.
  • Bia, Frank J.

Abstract

This research project, funded by the Yale International Committee and in cooperation with UNICEF, Nepal, used a questionnaire to survey and assess the immunization status of children 3 years or younger in a semi-urban panchayat. Mothers of children ranging in age from less than 1 month to 3 years were questioned both about immunization status of their children and their own use of health care and specific sources of information. 54% (124/228) of the children had received at least one vaccine and only 4% (10/228) had full coverage with the recommended vaccines (3 doses of DPT and TOPV, one dose of measles and BCG). The mean number of vaccinations for males was significantly greater than that for females (2.12 vs 1.39, P = 0.007, t = 2.80). Male children were twice as likely to have received vaccines as females (76/122, 62% vs 48/106, 45%; Odds Ratio = 2.00). Children born at a hospital were more likely than those born at home to have been vaccinated (23/34, 68% vs 101/194, 52%; P = 0.05, x2 = 12.52, d.f. = 2). Most mothers obtained health information from neighbors (38%), radio (22%), or health workers (18%), and 85% of the children were born at home; the majority (164/228, 72%) of the women received assistance during childbirth, 28% of the total reported self delivery. More than 70% of the women felt that vaccinations were good preventive measures. The study results suggest that health education about immunization efforts should be focused on women and these efforts should be intensified.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahluwalia, Indu B. & Helgerson, Steven D. & Bia, Frank J., 1988. "Immunization coverage of children in a semi-urban village panchayat in Nepal, 1985," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 265-268, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:2:p:265-268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90248-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:2:p:265-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.