IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v26y1988i11p1103-1107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses autonomy and job satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Carmel, Sara
  • Yakubovich, Ilana Shoham
  • Zwanger, Lea
  • Zaltcman, Tsila

Abstract

Nurses' autonomy is structurally limited by physicians' close supervision and control. A prolonged physicians' strike in Israel in 1983 created a special situation where for 3 months nurses had to provide primary health care services without physicians. This study, undertaken at the end of the strike, focuses on nurses' comparative perceptions of autonomy and job satisfaction with relation to role performance during the strike and in usual work conditions. Data were collected by means of a self-administered questionnaire. Sixty one percent (n = 1144) of the primary health care nurses in Israel responded. The strike situation increased the normal work load of the nurses, but it also gave many nurses the opportunity to initiate and carry out special programs in their clinics and communities. The majority of nurses report that in general they are satisfied with their work and perceive it as autonomous. The increase in routine as well as self-initiated activities was found to be positively but weakly correlated with an increase in job satisfaction and in the perception of role autonomy during the strike. These findings suggest that even after, or perhaps because of, being exposed to a significant change in contextual autonomy (working without physicians for a prolonged period of time) most Israeli primary care nurses do not appear to desire increased autonomy in the work place.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmel, Sara & Yakubovich, Ilana Shoham & Zwanger, Lea & Zaltcman, Tsila, 1988. "Nurses autonomy and job satisfaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(11), pages 1103-1107, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:11:p:1103-1107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90185-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:11:p:1103-1107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.