IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v25y1987i6p649-657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The political abuse of medicine and the challenge of opposing it

Author

Listed:
  • Zwi, Anthony B.

Abstract

A fundamental aim of medicine is to protect and promote health. The practice of medicine has, however, been used to promote political aims which may be detrimental to health. The article attempts to isolate the ways in which political abuses may interfere with good medical practice: by allowing health policies to be influenced by undemocratic political considerations; by using health services to reward or punish political supporters or opponents; by direct medical involvement in political acts which contradict accepted medical ethics; and by the support which conventional medical practises give to perpetuating inequalities in health and social services. Each of these is examined with the use of a number of examples. The ways in which medical personnel have opposed the political abuse of medicine is explored by a brief review of the opposition of Chilean doctors to torture, the involvement of South African doctors in opposing the abuse of health services in perpetuating apartheid, and the growing medical movement in opposition to nuclear war. Some comments concerning the monitoring of a multitude of medical disciplines which are open to political abuse are made. The purpose of the paper is primarily to stimulate debate around this important issue and it does not attempt to provide a comprehensive review of the political abuse of medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Zwi, Anthony B., 1987. "The political abuse of medicine and the challenge of opposing it," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 649-657, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:6:p:649-657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90092-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:6:p:649-657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.