IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v24y1987i7p619-624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in students' sociopolitical attitudes during medical school: Socialization or maturation effect?

Author

Listed:
  • Maheux, Brigitte
  • Béland, François

Abstract

This study examined medical students' attitudes toward the issue of universal access to medical care in order to determine whether students become more conservative with increased training and, if this is the case, whether changes in students' sociopolitical attitudes can be mostly attributed to the influence of professional education (socialization effect) or to the fact that students change their way of thinking as a result of getting older (maturation effect). Data were obtained from a survey of 586 freshmen, juniors and recent graduates trained in three differently-oriented schools, one being more socially-oriented in its approach to medical education than the other two. The findings documented a conservative trend in more advanced students, not only in the two traditional schools but in the socially-oriented school as well. However, based on the authors' conceptual model, this conservative trend could not be attributed to a pure socialization effect not to a pure maturation effect. Rather, both types of effect seemed simultaneously at play. In general, students' sociopolitical attitudes were more related to their personal background characteristics than to the characteristics of their professional medical training. These results suggest that selection more than medical training per se is the crucial determinant in influencing medical graduates' sociopolitical outlook.

Suggested Citation

  • Maheux, Brigitte & Béland, François, 1987. "Changes in students' sociopolitical attitudes during medical school: Socialization or maturation effect?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 619-624, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:7:p:619-624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90067-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:7:p:619-624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.