IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v24y1987i11p897-910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health outcome and higher medical qualifications: An economic conception and notes on implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Doessel, D. P.

Abstract

A major policy issue in the health sector is the relationship between the outcomes of a medical procedure provided by differently qualified medical personnel, and in which the medical service supplied by the different groups of providers are differently priced. This problem, which exists in health systems which have providers' remuneration based on either fee-for-service or salaries, has not been explicitly considered by economists. Although this question has been indirectly treated in the economic literature on occupational regulation, and directly in the medical literature on quality assessment, both literatures are deficient in different respects. This paper applies the characteristics theory of consumer demand to the problem. A procedure for establishing the nature of the relationship between levels of qualifications and health outcome in an illustrative case of discrete choice is outlined. It is emphasised that the nature of this relationship must be established empirically. It is shown that in this illustrative situation there are four distinct cases that can arise and that under certain circumstances the analysis of the problem can be appropriately conducted in terms of a single dimension of health status. Different prices for the medical service are introduced and the conditions under which a higher price for a service provided by a medical practitioner with higher qualifications can be justified in terms of consumer welfare are considered. The paper concludes with a discussion of some issues associated with an empirical application of the conceptual framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Doessel, D. P., 1987. "Health outcome and higher medical qualifications: An economic conception and notes on implementation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 24(11), pages 897-910, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:11:p:897-910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90283-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:11:p:897-910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.