IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v237y2019ic14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A good “doctor” is hard to find: Assessing uncredentialed expertise in assisted injection

Author

Listed:
  • Brothers, Sarah

Abstract

This article examines how laypeople assess uncredentialed expertise in a high-risk practice: assisted injection, in which one person injects another with illicit drugs. In metropolitan areas in the US, about 2.3% of the population injects illicit drugs. Injection assistance is common and recipients of injection assistance are at high-risk for injury, overdose, and infection. Yet little is known about how injection recipients attempt to reduce these risks by assessing their injection provider's expertise. Drawing on ethnographic observations and interviews from 2015 to 2018 with 59 people who inject drugs in San Francisco, California, this article examines how people who need injection assistance assess injection provider expertise. It finds that people use an informal hierarchized decision-tree approach of three measures of trust to assess expertise: strong personal ties, referrals, or professional rhetoric. Using measures of trust to assess expertise minimizes some forms of risk by increasing the chance that injection providers are motivated to help them. However, this strategy offers little protection against technically unskilled providers. Moreover, it may increase health risks because people employ few self-protective strategies in trust-based relationships. This research offers new insights for theorization on expertise and trust in social contexts where high-risk skills are in demand. This approach also has implications for public health research and interventions for reducing risks related to lay medical practices, particularly those in assisted injection.

Suggested Citation

  • Brothers, Sarah, 2019. "A good “doctor” is hard to find: Assessing uncredentialed expertise in assisted injection," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:237:y:2019:i:c:14
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795361930440X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fox, N.J. & Ward, K.J. & O'Rourke, A.J., 2005. "The 'expert patient': empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 1299-1309, March.
    2. Faulkner-Gurstein, Rachel, 2017. "The social logic of naloxone: Peer administration, harm reduction, and the transformation of social policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 20-27.
    3. Shannon, Kate & Kerr, Thomas & Allinott, Shari & Chettiar, Jill & Shoveller, Jean & Tyndall, Mark W., 2008. "Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 911-921, February.
    4. Rahill, G.J. & Rice, C., 2010. "Correlates of picuriste use in a sample of health-seeking haitian immigrants and adult children of immigrants in Miami-Dade County, Florida," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(S1), pages 140-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Collins, Alexandra B. & Boyd, Jade & Cooper, Hannah L.F. & McNeil, Ryan, 2019. "The intersectional risk environment of people who use drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Zhang, Chaoxiong, 2022. "Building care amid navigating liability risks: The possibility of policy-driven care in China's drug-control arena," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    3. Prior, Lindsay & Evans, Meirion R. & Prout, Hayley, 2011. "Talking about colds and flu: The lay diagnosis of two common illnesses among older British people," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 922-928, September.
    4. Shirley J Semple & Jamila K Stockman & Eileen V Pitpitan & Steffanie A Strathdee & Claudia V Chavarin & Doroteo V Mendoza & Gregory A Aarons & Thomas L Patterson, 2015. "Prevalence and Correlates of Client-Perpetrated Violence against Female Sex Workers in 13 Mexican Cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Scavarda, Alice & Ariel Cascio, M., 2022. "Embracing and rejecting the medicalization of autism in Italy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    6. Kuchinskaya, Olga & Parker, Lisa S., 2018. "‘Recurrent losers unite’: Online forums, evidence-based activism, and pregnancy loss," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 74-80.
    7. Salant, Talya & Santry, Heena P., 2006. "Internet marketing of bariatric surgery: Contemporary trends in the medicalization of obesity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2445-2457, May.
    8. Lazarus, L. & Chettiar, J. & Deering, K. & Nabess, R. & Shannon, K., 2011. "Risky health environments: Women sex workers’ struggles to find safe, secure and non-exploitative housing in Canada’s poorest postal code," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(11), pages 1600-1607.
    9. Stacey, Clare Louise & Henderson, Stuart & MacArthur, Kelly R. & Dohan, Daniel, 2009. "Demanding patient or demanding encounter?: A case study of a cancer clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 729-737, September.
    10. Menon, Alka V., 2017. "Do online reviews diminish physician authority? The case of cosmetic surgery in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1-8.
    11. McDonald, Ruth & Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh & Sanders, Caroline & Ashcroft, Darren, 2010. "Professional status in a changing world: The case of medicines use reviews in English community pharmacy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 451-458, August.
    12. Fiona Mercer & Joanna Astrid Miler & Bernie Pauly & Hannah Carver & Kristina Hnízdilová & Rebecca Foster & Tessa Parkes, 2021. "Peer Support and Overdose Prevention Responses: A Systematic ‘State-of-the-Art’ Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. McNeil, Ryan & Small, Will & Wood, Evan & Kerr, Thomas, 2014. "Hospitals as a ‘risk environment’: An ethno-epidemiological study of voluntary and involuntary discharge from hospital against medical advice among people who inject drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 59-66.
    14. Frank, Vibeke Asmussen & Bjerge, Bagga, 2011. "Empowerment in drug treatment: Dilemmas in implementing policy in welfare institutions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 201-208, July.
    15. Lehoux, Pascale & Daudelin, Genevieve & Demers-Payette, Olivier & Boivin, Antoine, 2009. "Fostering deliberations about health innovation: What do we want to know from publics?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2002-2009, June.
    16. Goodman, Ashley & Fleming, Kim & Markwick, Nicole & Morrison, Tracey & Lagimodiere, Louise & Kerr, Thomas, 2017. "“They treated me like crap and I know it was because I was Native”: The healthcare experiences of Aboriginal peoples living in Vancouver's inner city," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 87-94.
    17. Laura Meriluoto & Rachel Webb & Annick Masselot & Sussie Morrish & Gillian Abel, 2015. "Safety in the New Zealand sex industry," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 296-317, August.
    18. Lehoux, Pascale & Poland, Blake & Daudelin, Genevieve, 2006. "Focus group research and "the patient's view"," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 2091-2104, October.
    19. de Silva, M.W. Amarasiri & Albert, Steven M. & Jayasekara, J.M.K.B., 2017. "Structural violence and chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology in Sri Lanka," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 184-195.
    20. Sakib, MD Nazmus & Zolfagharian, Mohammadali & Yazdanparast, Atefeh, 2020. "Does parasocial interaction with weight loss vloggers affect compliance? The role of vlogger characteristics, consumer readiness, and health consciousness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:237:y:2019:i:c:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.