IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v22y1986i3p309-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agreement among judges on the severity of different morbidity states

Author

Listed:
  • Janssens, Gerrit K.

Abstract

In order to scale their severity, different states of morbidity are presented to subjects of six professional groups. By comparing the obtained scale scores with those assigned by legal institutions, bias in the subjective judgments can be detected. The judgment process is found to fall under a psychophysical law, Stevens' power law. The ordering of the morbidity states forms a basis to investigate if the subjects are likely to agree on their judgments. It is found that the medical professional groups not only assign other relative values to severity states but also order them in a different way.

Suggested Citation

  • Janssens, Gerrit K., 1986. "Agreement among judges on the severity of different morbidity states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 309-312, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:22:y:1986:i:3:p:309-312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90127-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:22:y:1986:i:3:p:309-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.