IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v21y1985i6p651-653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preference of hospital employees for work-related outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Nnadozie, Jonathan
  • Eldar, Reuben

Abstract

A list of five possible work-related outcomes was compiled and included in a questionnaire. This was administered to 490 employees, categorized into seven occupational groups, in three different hospitals in Manila, The Philippines. Responses were compared among work outcomes, identical occupational groups and three hospitals; the most valued outcome was established for all respondents. Findings indicate that variables apt to motivate employees depend on the occupational group to which they belong, the kind of work they perform and the type of hospital in which they work. These findings have implications for the ability of hospital administrators to motivate their employees to perform in a manner that meets expected standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Nnadozie, Jonathan & Eldar, Reuben, 1985. "Preference of hospital employees for work-related outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 651-653, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:6:p:651-653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90204-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:6:p:651-653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.