IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v21y1985i5p589-593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content analysis of speech of schizophrenic and control adoptees and their relatives: preliminary results

Author

Listed:
  • Kinney, Dennis K.
  • Jacobsen, Bjorn
  • Bechgaard, Birgitte
  • Jansson, Lennart
  • Faber, Britta
  • Kasell, Eva
  • Uliana, Regina L.

Abstract

Speech samples were collected on 20 Danish schizophrenic adoptees, along with 26 control adoptees and their respective biological and adoptive relatives. Typewritten transcripts of these speech samples were scored using the Gottschalk-Gleser Social Alienation-Personal Disorganization (SA-PD), or 'Schizophrenic', content analysis scale. Both mean scale scores and the proportion of subjects with extremely high (i.e. deviant) scores were significantly higher in schizophrenic adoptees than in either (a) subjects with no psychiatric disorder or (b) the sample with psychiatric disorders other than schizophrenia. The proportion of deviant scores was also notably high among subjects who, though not schizophrenic, had schizotypal features on the SADS-L interview. Scores were particularly high in schizophrenic adoptees who had a biological parent or sibling with schizophrenia or schizotypal features. By contrast, scores of 29 adoptive relatives of the schizophrenic probands were quite low. The present study appears to corroborate the results of previous studies done in the U.S.A. and Great Britain which suggest that high scores on the SA-PD scale tend to characterize those schizophrenics for whom genetic liability appears to be strongest.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinney, Dennis K. & Jacobsen, Bjorn & Bechgaard, Birgitte & Jansson, Lennart & Faber, Britta & Kasell, Eva & Uliana, Regina L., 1985. "Content analysis of speech of schizophrenic and control adoptees and their relatives: preliminary results," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 589-593, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:5:p:589-593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90044-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:5:p:589-593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.