IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v21y1985i10p1199-1202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics and economic appraisals in health care

Author

Listed:
  • Sabatini, Jean

Abstract

Although the author recognizes that the ethical point of view cpuld be an aid to a group of professionals, he examines the ethical value of economic appraisal in health care. First of all he considers the issue of the experimental nature of appraisals and demonstrates that certain studies using human subjects do not respect the most elementary ethical rules: conformity of the experiment to the present state of scientific knowledge, consideration for the risks which the experiment could involve for the subject, consent of the person concerned. Without aiming at an exhaustive list he then looks at the different value conflicts which could be picked out, a characteristic of ethical research. He states first of all that economic appraisals in health care try to bring together very different value systems in using common criteria in decisions, but this cannot completely eliminate these systems and the conflicts which stem from them. In particular he underlines the phenomenon of occultation which could result from the use of mathematical formulae. After then contradictions between medicine and economics he then goes on to point out the contradictions between the levels of understanding reality, between fields of economic or social considerations. Finally, he insists on the mobility of ethical thought and on the vigilance which it is always necessary to observe.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabatini, Jean, 1985. "Ethics and economic appraisals in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 21(10), pages 1199-1202, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:10:p:1199-1202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90180-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:10:p:1199-1202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.