IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v21y1985i10p1089-1096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subsidizing pharmaceutical prescriptions: The experience of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Lindgren, Björn
  • Silverberg, Raymunda

Abstract

In 1980, drug consumption per capita was 455 Swedish crowns (SEK) in Sweden, SEK 452 in Denmark, SEK 384 in Finland and SEK 382 in Norway; actual figures for Denmark, Finland and Norway being converted into Swedish crowns using the mean 1980 exchange rates. To what extent can these differences be explained by differences in the drug reimbursement programmes for these four Nordic countries? For instance, is it the greater generosity of the Swedish system--in Sweden, the share of drug reimbursement expenditures to total drug consumption is 57%, as against 33% in Norway, 38% in Finland and 34% in Denmark--that makes drug consumption per capita so much higher in Sweden? If the demand for drugs were elastic and if all other influencing factors, besides the reimbursement system, were the same in all the four Nordic countries, then a definite conclusion would, obviously, be fairly easy to reach. However, a number of factors do differ: for instance, income per capita, physician remuneration schemes (and, hence, maybe, physician behaviour) and consumer charges for inpatient and outpatient care; and other factors such as morbidity and patterns of illness may differ. A complete analysis has to take all these factors into account. Too many factors seem to vary to make the sole use of cross-section data meaningful in this case. Time-series data are available and will be used in future analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindgren, Björn & Silverberg, Raymunda, 1985. "Subsidizing pharmaceutical prescriptions: The experience of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 21(10), pages 1089-1096, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:10:p:1089-1096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90165-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:10:p:1089-1096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.