IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i12p1289-1294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relativism in the diagnosis of hypoglycemia

Author

Listed:
  • Hunt, Linda M.

Abstract

It is a common assumption in our medicalized society that diagnostic labels simply describe facts, rather than express the diagnostician's own concepts of anomaly and dysfunction. Variability among physicians in diagnosing reactive hypoglycemia illustrates some fundamental problems of reifying the concept of disease. Although most physicians consider the same three variables in this diagnosis, their interpretations of them may vary widely. The disagreement centers around the credibility given standardized, technological measures versus the individual patient's experiences. Most physicians consider lab tests definitive in diagnosing hypoglycemia, while bypassing patients' subjective reports. Some, however, rely more heavily on patient-generated criteria to diagnose the condition. This lack of agreement about the criteria for diagnosing hypoglycemia, coupled with the psychological nature of many of the symptoms, make hypoglycemia and psychological disorder reasonable alternative diagnoses. These diagnoses, in turn, have very different effects on patients. These variations in physician's diagnostic criteria illustrate that diagnostic labels are cognitive constructs, subject to the influence of the physician's culture, expectations, values and interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunt, Linda M., 1985. "Relativism in the diagnosis of hypoglycemia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(12), pages 1289-1294, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:12:p:1289-1294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90383-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:12:p:1289-1294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.