IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i11p1199-1205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex differences in the psychological reactions of medical and surgical patients to crisis intervention counseling: Sauce for the goose may not be sauce for the gander

Author

Listed:
  • Viney, Linda L.
  • Benjamin, Yvonne N.
  • Clarke, Alex M.
  • Bunn, Terence A.

Abstract

The psychological reactions of 259 female and 130 male medical and surgical patients were examined. Both when they were discharged and when they were followed up 12 months later, women who received crisis intervention counseling during their hospitalisation showed the predicted psychological gains when compared with non-counseled women. They expressed fewer feelings of helplessness and more of competence in the short term and fewer feelings of anxiety and helplessness in the long term. Men showed some improvements in the short term but fewer in the long term when, although they later expressed more feelings of competence, there were also more of helplessness. Women and men also showed the predicted benefits of counseling similarly in fewer indirect expressions of anger on both occasions. They also showed less anxiety on discharge and fewer depressive feelings on follow-up. Explanations of the sex differences in terms of sex role stereotypes, the extent of each patient's crisis and possible methodological artefacts were considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Viney, Linda L. & Benjamin, Yvonne N. & Clarke, Alex M. & Bunn, Terence A., 1985. "Sex differences in the psychological reactions of medical and surgical patients to crisis intervention counseling: Sauce for the goose may not be sauce for the gander," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(11), pages 1199-1205, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:11:p:1199-1205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90198-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:11:p:1199-1205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.