IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i11p1169-1175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional identification: A study of female students at a medical college in India

Author

Listed:
  • Bhargava, Gura

Abstract

This paper explores female medical students' identification with their profession at a medical college in India by comparing it with that of male students. The professional identification is conceptualized as having three elements: career commitment, career-satisfaction and professional self-image, each elicited by a single question. Compared to males, females were found to perceive medicine as more satisfying, and yet they were less sure than males of pursuing a medical career throughout their lives. The female students' commitment to their career was basically conditional, whereas for the males, it was primarily categorical. Additionally, females expressed less professional ambition than males and preferred different specialties. The main thrust of this paper is that the professional identification of both males and females is qualitatively different. The reasons for these differences are sought in sex-role socialization, cultural norms and informal social pressures at home and at the college.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhargava, Gura, 1985. "Professional identification: A study of female students at a medical college in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(11), pages 1169-1175, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:11:p:1169-1175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90194-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:11:p:1169-1175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.