Selecting neonatal ethics
Abstract
Nontreatment of handicapped newborns has disturbed American society, prompting heated debate and new attempts by government at regulation. Robert Weir's new book reviews the elements of this controversy as argued by concerned doctors, lawyers and ethicists. Unfortunately, we do not know the magnitude or scope of the problem. We know little about how often or under what circumstances physicians practice nontreatment. In discussing the issues, Weir and others have paid inadequate attention to medical uncertainty. The inability to accurately predict outcome makes clinical judgment harder than most philosophers and others acknowledge. Many legal arguments are outdated. The concept of personhood Weir and ethicists invoke confounds decision making. Complex or uncertain medicomoral dilemmas will not be resolved more easily by ethics committees. This procedural solution to a substantive quandry creates new problems. More attention must be paid to patients' current and future suffering when deciding whether to treat severely handicapped infants.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.
Volume (Year): 20 (1985)
Issue (Month): 11 (January)
Pages: 1085-1090
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description
Order Information:
Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
Web: http://www.elsevier.com/orderme/journalorderform.cws_home/315/journalorderform1/orderooc/id=654&ref=654_01_ooc_1&version=01
Related research
Keywords:References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:11:p:1085-1090For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wendy Shamier).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.