IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i6p609-618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological and conceptual issues in measuring the long term impact of disability: The experience of poliomyelitis patients in Manitoba

Author

Listed:
  • Kaufert, Patricia Leyland
  • Kaufert, Joseph M.

Abstract

This paper is based on a Canadian study which is examining the long term impact of disability among people who developed respiratory or non-respiratory polio during the epidemics of the 1950s and who were admitted to the same Manitoba hospital, the centralized treatment centre for the Province. This research is exploring change in the lives of these individuals by focusing on three conceptually distinct, although empirically overlapping areas or dimensions. The first is called the 'trajectory of disability' and refers to changes in functional status. The second includes those changes which are the product of the interaction between the normal processes of aging and the long term impact of poliomyelitis. The third is changes in the context of disability. This refers not only to changes in medical and technological knowledge, but sociopolitical developments including the emergence of a Disabled Rights Consumer Movement. This paper discusses the methodological and conceptual issues involved in the study, particularly its combination of different methods of data collection and the value of its historical-prospective design for capturing the effects of change over time in each of these different dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaufert, Patricia Leyland & Kaufert, Joseph M., 1984. "Methodological and conceptual issues in measuring the long term impact of disability: The experience of poliomyelitis patients in Manitoba," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 609-618, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:6:p:609-618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90227-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:6:p:609-618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.