IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i5p573-580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of health beliefs in compliance with physician advice to quit smoking

Author

Listed:
  • Pederson, Linda L.
  • Wanklin, James M.
  • Baskerville, Jon C.

Abstract

The Health Belief Model has been proposed to account for patient compliance with therapeutic regimens. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the utility of this theoretical formulation in accounting for compliance with physician advice to quit smoking among patients with pulmonary disease. Three hypotheses were examined: (1) probability of cessation of smoking is positively related to strength of Health Beliefs; (2) Health Beliefs can be used to explain relationships observed between other variables and compliance; (3) reason for smoking accounts for discrepancies between Health Beliefs and compliance. Results from a prospective study of 308 patients supported hypothesis 3, partially supported hypothesis 1, and did not support hypothesis 2. It was concluded that this conceptual formulation is useful in this context, but that explanations based on arousal level may be more appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • Pederson, Linda L. & Wanklin, James M. & Baskerville, Jon C., 1984. "The role of health beliefs in compliance with physician advice to quit smoking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 573-580, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:5:p:573-580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90052-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:5:p:573-580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.