IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i4p475-478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risks, survival and trends of malignant melanoma among white and blue collar workers in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Vågerö, Denny
  • Persson, Gunnar

Abstract

All persons in Sweden, classified as white or blue collar workers in the 1960 Population Census, were followed up for the period 1961-1973 with regard to the occurrence of cancer. The SMRs were calculated for 50 tumour sites and it was found that the crude classification of occupations into white or blue collar workers was particularly important for malignant melanoma risk. The number of malignant melanoma cases among blue collar workers was significantly lower than expected while it was significantly higher than expected among the white collar workers. This was true for men as well as for women. The SMRs were calculated to be 87 and 141 (men) and 79 and 117 (women), respectively. Comparing the relative survival probabilities it was found that white collar workers had a higher probability of survival than blue collar workers. This might indicate that the difference in occurrence could be dependent on early detection as well as differential risk. The incidence of malignant melanoma is increasing faster than any other kind of tumour in Sweden. For the period 1961-1970 the incidence rate increased two-fold for blue collar workers and more than two-fold for white collar workers (men). In absolute terms the white collar workers in the age group 45-64 had an appreciably faster increase in incidence over this period compared to all other groups studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Vågerö, Denny & Persson, Gunnar, 1984. "Risks, survival and trends of malignant melanoma among white and blue collar workers in Sweden," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 475-478, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:4:p:475-478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90207-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:4:p:475-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.