IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i11p1131-1139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Going up in smoke: The case of British American tobacco in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Currie, Kate
  • Ray, Larry

Abstract

Faced in the developed world by increasing restrictions on cigarette advertising and sales, and with declining markets, the tobacco transnationals are opening up new markets in developing countries, where they face few controls and little health education. As cigarette sales increase in the Third World, so does the evidence of an increasing incidence of smoking-related diseases. This paper considers the case study of BAT (Kenya) Ltd, a subsidiary of the London-based transnational, which since 1974 has encouraged both local leaf production and increased cigarette sales in Kenya. We examine: (1) the relationship between BAT (K) and the Kenya state, the recruitment of farmers into the leaf growing scheme, how BAT (K)'s directorships interlock with those of other leading Kenyan firms and the implications of these for the company's power and influence; (2) BAT (K)'s marketing strategies, how successful they have been, and how they compare with codes of conduct agreed in developed countries; and (3) we estimate the likely success of possible strategies to combat the smoking hazard in Kenya. We conclude that although BAT (K) might make minor concessions to the 'health lobby' in Kenya, it is sufficiently powerful, and the leaf growing programme is given sufficient Government support, as to make fundamental changes unlikely in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Currie, Kate & Ray, Larry, 1984. "Going up in smoke: The case of British American tobacco in Kenya," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(11), pages 1131-1139, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:11:p:1131-1139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90362-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:11:p:1131-1139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.