IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i22p1709-1713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The epidemiology of trachoma blindness in Southern Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Kok, Peter W.

Abstract

Twenty five years ago medical scientists working in Southern Africa clarified the natural history of trachoma and how it affected vision impairment and eventual blindness in rural communities. After this, doctors attempted to take appropriate actions against the disease. Initial surveys indicated a blindness prevalence rate of 760/100,000 among rural Africans compared to 100/100,000 among the white population. Trachoma was found to be the main cause of blindness. It was found mostly among children under 15 years to a very high degree and seemed to start soon after birth. Vaccine development failed and mass treatment was started. Control measures which did not reach the community, the population at risk, and which did not affect ways of living were found to be ineffective. Community health programmes were thus started but only in a few areas. Further, it was found that non-medical control strategies would be more effective and efficient. Improvement of living standards is one such strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kok, Peter W., 1983. "The epidemiology of trachoma blindness in Southern Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(22), pages 1709-1713, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:22:p:1709-1713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90381-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:22:p:1709-1713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.