IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v175y2017icp52-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic factors related to surgical treatment for localized, non-small cell lung cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Xiaqing
  • Lin, Ge
  • Islam, K.M. Monirul

Abstract

Various socioeconomic factors were reported to be associated with receiving surgical treatment in localized, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in previous studies. We wanted to assess the impact of residential poverty on receiving surgical treatment in a state-wide population of localized NSCLC, adjusting for demographic, clinical, residence and tumor factors. Data on 970 patients with primary localized NSCLC were collected from the Nebraska Cancer Registry (NCR), and linked with the Nebraska Hospital Discharge Data (NHDD) between 2005 and 2009, as well as the 2010 Census data. Characteristics of patients with and without surgery were compared using Chi-square tests. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of receiving surgery for low versus high poverty were generated based on the series of logistic regression models controlling for demographics, comorbidity, residence and tumor histology. Patients who were 65 year old or younger, without comorbidities, single or married, and with adenocarcinoma histologic type were more likely to receive surgery. Without adjustment, poverty was negatively associated with receiving surgery. Patients who resided in low poverty neighborhoods (less than 5% of the households under poverty line) were twice more likely to receive surgery than those who lived in high poverty neighborhoods (more than 15% of the households under poverty line) (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33–3.40). After adjustment, poverty was independently and negatively associated with receiving surgery treatment. Residents in low poverty neighborhoods were still about twice more likely to receive surgery than those in high poverty neighborhoods when the other demographic, urban/rural residency and clinical factors were adjusted (ORs 2.01–2.18, all p < 0.05). The mechanism of how living in poverty interacts with other factors and its impact on patient's choice and their chance of getting surgical treatment invites future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Xiaqing & Lin, Ge & Islam, K.M. Monirul, 2017. "Socioeconomic factors related to surgical treatment for localized, non-small cell lung cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 52-57.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:175:y:2017:i:c:p:52-57
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953616307225
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gorey, K.M. & Holowaty, E.J. & Fehringer, G. & Laukkanen, E. & Moskowitz, A. & Webster, D.J. & Richter, N.L., 1997. "An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(7), pages 1156-1163.
    2. Greenwald, H.P. & Polissar, N.L. & Borgatta, E.F. & McCorkle, R. & Goodman, G., 1998. "Social factors, treatment, and survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(11), pages 1681-1684.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haynes, Robin & Pearce, Jamie & Barnett, Ross, 2008. "Cancer survival in New Zealand: Ethnic, social and geographical inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 928-937, September.
    2. Huguet, Nathalie & Kaplan, Mark S. & Feeny, David, 2008. "Socioeconomic status and health-related quality of life among elderly people: Results from the Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 803-810, February.
    3. Hugh Armstrong & Wallace Clement & Zhiqiu Lin & Steven Prus, 2006. "Contrasting Inequalities: Comparing Correlates of Health in Canada and the United States," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 167, McMaster University.
    4. Sam Peltzman, 2014. "Socialized medicine and mortality," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 179-205, September.
    5. Fanny Cros & Sébastien Lamy & Pascale Grosclaude & Antoine Nebout & Emilien Chabrillac & Sébastien Vergez & Pierre Bories & Agnès Dupret-Bories, 2021. "Physician practice variation in head and neck cancer therapy: Results of a national survey," Post-Print hal-03373358, HAL.
    6. Arnold Kamis & Rui Cao & Yifan He & Yuan Tian & Chuyue Wu, 2021. "Predicting Lung Cancer in the United States: A Multiple Model Examination of Public Health Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-27, June.
    7. Samuel Cykert & Nancy Phifer, 2003. "Surgical Decisions for Early Stage, Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Which Racially Sensitive Perceptions of Cancer Are Likely to Explain Racial Variation in Surgery?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(2), pages 167-176, March.
    8. Viorela Diaconu & Nadine Ouellette & Robert Bourbeau, 2020. "Modal lifespan and disparity at older ages by leading causes of death: a Canada-U.S. comparison," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 323-344, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:175:y:2017:i:c:p:52-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.