IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i19p1657-1662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of reproductive knowledge in an inner-city clinic

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Shirley M.
  • Snow, Loudell F.

Abstract

A number of studies have shown that misinformation and lack of information about the menstrual cycle contributes to unwanted fertility, particularly among black women. A short, self-administered questionnaire was developed and tested in an inner-city, prenatal clinic serving a primarily low-income undereducated, black clientele. Data were gathered concerning numbers of pregnancies and abortions, knowledge of the menstrual cycle, past contraceptive use, including dissatisfaction and discontinuance, and planned future use of contraception. Results showed that the majority of women had had at least one unwanted pregnancy. Their knowledge base about female reproductive function and their poor use of contraception contributed to these unwanted pregnancies. It is concluded that a few key questions can help identify the woman with special informational needs, enabling the health professional to gear educational efforts to the individual patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Shirley M. & Snow, Loudell F., 1982. "Assessment of reproductive knowledge in an inner-city clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(19), pages 1657-1662, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:19:p:1657-1662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90089-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:19:p:1657-1662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.