IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v90y2023ics0038012123002409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency analysis of Chinese universities with shared inputs: An aggregated two-stage network DEA approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Ya
  • Pan, Yongbin
  • Liu, Haoxiang
  • Wu, Huaqing
  • Deng, Guangwei

Abstract

Evaluating the resource utilization efficiency of a country's universities is a prerequisite for implementing a balanced development strategy. Universities often share some resources such as the teachers and fixed assets used for teaching and research. Data envelopment analysis (DEA), as a non-parametric method for performance evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs), has been used for measuring the operating efficiency of universities with shared inputs based on radial measures under multiplier DEA models. However, few existing studies consider non-radial measures and different perspectives of external and internal evaluations. From both external and internal perspectives, we propose aggregated two-stage DEA models to measure the efficiency scores of 52 Chinese universities in 2014. The main results indicate that: (1) both internal and external evaluations yield relatively high average operating efficiency, with around 53 % of universities being efficient. The allocation ratios of shared inputs for the same university differ according to the internal and external evaluations. (2) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that 985 universities are less efficient than non-985 universities, and comprehensive universities operate more efficiently than science and engineering universities. (3) There are efficiency differences between 985 and non-985 universities in the teaching stage. Science and engineering as well as comprehensive universities also differ in the teaching efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Ya & Pan, Yongbin & Liu, Haoxiang & Wu, Huaqing & Deng, Guangwei, 2023. "Efficiency analysis of Chinese universities with shared inputs: An aggregated two-stage network DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s0038012123002409
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012123002409
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s0038012123002409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.