IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v90y2023ics0038012123002148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of Chinese commercial banks by an improved slacks-based DEA model

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Xiao
  • Wang, Libo
  • Emrouznejad, Ali

Abstract

The national economy heavily relies on the banking sector, and researchers have been focused on discovering the most effective method of enhancing bank's overall efficiency. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a commonly utilized tool for measuring banking efficiency. We proposed an improved slacks-based measure model (SBM) with undesirable outputs using a by-production framework. In such case, the bank's operating process is considered as a parallel system. Inputs are categorized into interest costs and operating costs, which are then evaluated in two separate parallel stages. In the first stage, outputs are categorized into interest income and non-interest income, which are shared and considered as final outputs. In the second stage, non-performing loans are deemed as undesirable outputs. This proposed approach splits bank efficiency into two parallel stages, enabling us to identify the source of overall inefficiency, and effectively capture the efficiency differences between the two types of costs. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, we have successfully applied it to 36 commercial banks in China from 2016 to 2021. The empirical results of the research prove that the changes of the banks' overall efficiencies were mainly due to the changes of stage 2. And this approach provides a rich source of information to assist in decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Xiao & Wang, Libo & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2023. "Performance evaluation of Chinese commercial banks by an improved slacks-based DEA model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s0038012123002148
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012123002148
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101702?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s0038012123002148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.