IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v107y2023ics2214804323001076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the limits of hierarchy in public goods games: A survey and meta-analysis on the effects of design variables on cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Billinger, Stephan
  • Rosenbaum, Stephen Mark

Abstract

We contribute to the emerging literature on the influence of hierarchy on group cooperation by reporting the findings of a meta-analysis on data aggregated from 20 public goods game (PGG) studies that entail design variables relevant in hierarchies, comprising 51 treatments with effect sizes, and more than 48,000 observations. Our findings attest to the limited effect of hierarchical design variables on worker cooperation. Any positive effects were short-term, with punishment being the only mechanism capable of sustaining cooperation over the longer run. Contrary to popular conception, our results suggest that leaders/managers’ ability to facilitate group cooperation over time may not improve upon levels observed in the leaderless baseline experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Billinger, Stephan & Rosenbaum, Stephen Mark, 2023. "On the limits of hierarchy in public goods games: A survey and meta-analysis on the effects of design variables on cooperation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:107:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323001076
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2023.102081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804323001076
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:107:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323001076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.