IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v106y2023ics2214804323000897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Punishment credibility and cooperation in public good games

Author

Listed:
  • Almeida, Sergio

Abstract

This paper investigates the efficacy of a punishment mechanism in promoting cooperative behaviour in a public goods game when punishment enforcement is risky. Experimental studies have found that a sanctioning system can induce individuals to adopt behaviour deemed socially acceptable in such games. Our experiment qualifies this result by showing that a sanctioning system can only promote cooperative behaviour if subjects perceive punishment enforcement as a high-probability event. This result supports the view that sanctioning systems can only induce people to comply with social norms that enhance efficiency if such systems are sufficiently credible. We also find that the more punishment points towards a player were not being enforced in the history of the game, the more punishment from others was directed to them. This suggests that bygones are not bygones and that punishment behaviour attempts to compensate for the history of free-riding that goes unpunished.

Suggested Citation

  • Almeida, Sergio, 2023. "Punishment credibility and cooperation in public good games," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:106:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323000897
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2023.102063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804323000897
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:106:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323000897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.