IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v20yi1-2p151-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the duality of competition and collaboration: network-based knowledge relations in the biotechnology industry

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver, Amalya L.

Abstract

This paper focuses on organizational innovation within knowledge-intensive firms, exemplified by the biotechnology industry, and pinpoints the interorganizational network as an important mechanism facilitating innovation and the growth of organizational knowledge in such firms. It is argued that a complex structural and process investigation of different collaborative and competitive forms can help us to understand the adaptability dimension in the behavior of knowledge-intensive firms. The use of a flexible prism methodology is suggested for exploring the competition/collaboration duality. Such an approach can help us to trace interchangeability between the two halves of the duality. This phenomenon is described in greater detail in the concluding section of the paper, where positive and negative externalities of collaboration and competition in network-based knowledge relations are illustrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver, Amalya L., 0. "On the duality of competition and collaboration: network-based knowledge relations in the biotechnology industry," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 151-171, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:20:y::i:1-2:p:151-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522104000272
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoqing Li & Yu Zheng & Catherine L. Wang, 2016. "Inter-firm collaboration in new product development in Chinese pharmaceutical companies," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 165-193, March.
    2. Julia Brennecke & Irena Schierjott & Olaf Rank, 2016. "Informal Managerial Networks and Formal Firm Alliances," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 17(1), pages 103-125, April.
    3. Julien Granata & Katherine Gundolf & Pierre Marques, 2021. "Managing Paradoxical Tensions in a Coopetitive Context Horizontal Multiple-Firm Coopetition [Gérer les tensions paradoxales dans un contexte coopétitif : la coopétition horizontale multi-entreprise," Post-Print hal-03619371, HAL.
    4. Colette Depeyre & Emmanuelle Rigaud & Fabien Seraidarian, 2018. "Coopetition in the French luxury industry: five cases of brand-building by suppliers of luxury brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(5), pages 463-473, September.
    5. Estelle Pellegrin-Boucher & Frédéric Le Roy, 2009. "Dynamique des stratégies de coopétition dans le secteur des TIC: le cas des ERP," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 12(3), pages 97-130, September.
    6. Chiambaretto, Paul & Massé, David & Mirc, Nicola, 2019. "“All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 584-600.
    7. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Marieta Olaru & Liviu Bogdan Vlad, 2018. "An Exploratory Study on Coopetitive Behavior in Oil and Gas Distribution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Martin-Rios, Carlos, 2014. "Why do firms seek to share human resource management knowledge? The importance of inter-firm networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 190-199.
    9. Paul Chiambaretto & David Massé & Nicola Mirc, 2019. "“All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case," Post-Print hal-02104540, HAL.
    10. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Kraus, Sascha, 2013. "Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2060-2070.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:20:y::i:1-2:p:151-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.