IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v59y2016icp1493-1503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small-scale hydropower in the Netherlands: Problems and strategies of system builders

Author

Listed:
  • Manders, Tanja N.
  • Höffken, Johanna I.
  • van der Vleuten, Erik B.A.

Abstract

Small-scale hydroelectricity (hydel) currently receives worldwide attention as a clean, green, and socially just energy technology. People generally assume that downsizing hydel plants reduces harmful impacts. However, recent debates call for careful circumspection of small hydel’s environmental, social, and economic sustainability, if we are to avoid conflicts, costly setbacks, and hype-disappointment cycles. This paper provides such a circumspect case for the Netherlands, an interesting country thanks to its highly institutionalized water sector. We highlight the importance of studying hydel power as part of a larger, interconnected Large Technical System. For selected cases, we identify what tensions small hydel ‘system builders’ are facing and discuss which strategies they use to address these problems. We distinguish ‘yield to fit in’, ‘confirmative policy focus’, and ‘hydel legitimation’ strategies for the development of small-scale hydropower in the Dutch highly-institutionalized wet network.

Suggested Citation

  • Manders, Tanja N. & Höffken, Johanna I. & van der Vleuten, Erik B.A., 2016. "Small-scale hydropower in the Netherlands: Problems and strategies of system builders," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1493-1503.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:59:y:2016:i:c:p:1493-1503
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115014835
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria José Sousa, 2022. "Digital Technologies for Urban Greening Public Policies," GEE Papers 0166, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Jun 2022.
    2. Kumar, K. Ravi & Dashora, Kavya & Krishnan, Naveen & Sanyal, S. & Chandra, Hukum & Dharmaraja, S. & Kumari, Vandita, 2021. "Feasibility assessment of renewable energy resources for tea plantation and industry in India - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Ptak, Thomas & Crootof, Arica & Harlan, Tyler & Kelly, Sarah, 2022. "Critically evaluating the purported global “boom” in small hydropower development through spatial and temporal analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Năstase, Gabriel & Şerban, Alexandru & Năstase, Alina Florentina & Dragomir, George & Brezeanu, Alin Ionuţ & Iordan, Nicolae Fani, 2017. "Hydropower development in Romania. A review from its beginnings to the present," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 297-312.
    5. Ferrario, Viviana & Castiglioni, Benedetta, 2017. "Visibility/invisibility in the 'making' of energy landscape. Strategies and policies in the hydropower development of the Piave river (Italian Eastern Alps)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 829-835.
    6. Manzano-Agugliaro, Francisco & Taher, Myriam & Zapata-Sierra, Antonio & Juaidi, Adel & Montoya, Francisco G., 2017. "An overview of research and energy evolution for small hydropower in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 476-489.
    7. David Eggleton, 2020. "Tailoring Leadership to the Phase-Specific Needs of Large Scale Research Infrastructures," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-15, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:59:y:2016:i:c:p:1493-1503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.