IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v221y2024ics0960148123017251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of catholyte on performance of photosynthetic microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and energy recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Ullah, Zia
  • Zeshan,

Abstract

The performance of photosynthetic microbial fuel cell (PMFC) was assessed for wastewater treatment and energy recovery using two different catholytes; untreated domestic wastewater (UDW) and wetland treated wastewater (WTW). The performance was investigated under continuous light and 12/12 h light/dark cycle, employing Scenedesmus sp. as a biocatalyst. The results showed that PMFC with UDW as the catholyte outperformed the WTW under both types of illumination. Under continuous illumination, the PMFC with UDW achieved a maximum working voltage 33 % higher than that of WTW. The rates of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and nutrient removal in the cathode chamber were significantly higher for PMFC with UDW catholyte. Maximum dissolved oxygen (DO) reached 10 and 8.4 mg/L for UDW and WTW, respectively, with corresponding algae concentrations of 5165 and 3130 mg/L. Under the light/dark cycle, both the working voltage and DO concentration exhibited a diurnal pattern. The maximum algal growth, DO and power output in UDW were higher than WTW under 12/12 h light-dark cycle; however, these values remained lower compared to continuous illumination. These results demonstrate the feasibility of PMFC for both untreated and secondary treated domestic wastewater as catholytes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ullah, Zia & Zeshan,, 2024. "Effect of catholyte on performance of photosynthetic microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and energy recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:221:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123017251
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123017251
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:221:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123017251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.