IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v220y2024ics0960148123015951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative transient assessment and optimization of battery and hydrogen energy storage systems for near-zero energy buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammadi, Zahra
  • Ahmadi, Pouria
  • Ashjaee, Mehdi

Abstract

This research study aims to address the integration of solar energy systems that can be incorporated into buildings to provide zero-energy buildings. In this study, a typical building is considered located in Bandar Abbas city, Iran. Since renewable energy is not always available, energy storage becomes crucial to supplying the energy needed. The primary objective of this case study is to compare two different methods of energy storage: battery and hydrogen storage. TRNSYS, a powerful program for transient simulation is used to model the energy system. TRNSYS's energy system simulation provides consumers with several notable benefits, but it lacks optimization methods. A neural network-genetic algorithm optimization is suggested as a solution to solve this issue. The results indicate that in systems with battery and H2 storage, 39 % and 37 % of the buildings' required electricity can be generated by PV panels, respectively. The findings show that integrating a storage system into the primary system enhances the system's energy security and reduces reliance on grid power. Following that, the optimal value related to the power of the electrolyzer, and fuel cell is computed using a neural network-genetic algorithm optimization approach. The optimal configuration has the least loss of power supply probability (LPSP), CO2 emission, and installation costs. MATLAB software is used to perform the optimization process. According to evaluated data, the hydrogen storage system results in total CO2 generation, LPSP, and total cost of 342 (ton/year), 0.841, and 0.637 (EUR.hr−1), respectively. Also, a parametric study on the battery-based system showed that with the best capacity (7 kW), the values of LPSP, CO2, and cost are 0.5412, 249 (ton/year), and 0.2751 (EUR.hr−1), respectively. Consequently, the battery is an appropriate storage solution for this case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammadi, Zahra & Ahmadi, Pouria & Ashjaee, Mehdi, 2024. "Comparative transient assessment and optimization of battery and hydrogen energy storage systems for near-zero energy buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123015951
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123015951
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123015951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.