IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v152y2016icp281-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accurate construction of high dimensional model representation with applications to uncertainty quantification

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yaning
  • Yousuff Hussaini, M.
  • Ökten, Giray

Abstract

Surrogate modeling is a popular and practical method to meet the needs of a large number of queries of computationally demanding models in the analysis of uncertainty, sensitivity and system reliability. We explore various methods that can improve the accuracy of a particular class of surrogate models, the high dimensional model representation (HDMR), and their performances in uncertainty quantification and variance-based global sensitivity analysis. Rigorous analysis is provided to show the equivalence of the two common types of HDMRs—Cut-HDMR and random sampling-HDMR (RS-HDMR), when they are the same order of truncation. We propose using the nodes of Gauss and Clenshaw–Curtis quadratures as the interpolation points for the construction of Cut-HDMR to achieve high (spectral) accuracy for both the surrogate model and global sensitivity indices. As for RS-HDMR, randomized quasi-Monte Carlo sampling with variance reduction techniques, coupled with a procedure to select the optimal polynomial orders and prune potential noise terms, is shown to be capable of effectively enhancing the model accuracy. The efficiency of our proposed methods is demonstrated by a few analytical examples that are commonly studied for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis algorithms. Finally, we apply HDMR surrogate modeling techniques for an operational wildland fire model that is widely employed in fire prevention and safety control, and a chemical kinetics H2/air combustion model predicting the ignition delay time, which plays an important role in studying fuel and combustion system reliability and safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yaning & Yousuff Hussaini, M. & Ökten, Giray, 2016. "Accurate construction of high dimensional model representation with applications to uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 281-295.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:152:y:2016:i:c:p:281-295
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016300114
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blatman, Géraud & Sudret, Bruno, 2010. "Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1216-1229.
    2. Kucherenko, S. & Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. & Pantelides, C. & Shah, N., 2009. "Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1135-1148.
    3. Storlie, Curtis B. & Swiler, Laura P. & Helton, Jon C. & Sallaberry, Cedric J., 2009. "Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1735-1763.
    4. Marrel, Amandine & Iooss, Bertrand & Laurent, Béatrice & Roustant, Olivier, 2009. "Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 742-751.
    5. Okten, Giray & Eastman, Warren, 2004. "Randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods in pricing securities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 2399-2426, December.
    6. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    7. Crestaux, Thierry & Le Maıˆtre, Olivier & Martinez, Jean-Marc, 2009. "Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1161-1172.
    8. Kucherenko, Sergei & Feil, Balazs & Shah, Nilay & Mauntz, Wolfgang, 2011. "The identification of model effective dimensions using global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 440-449.
    9. Sobol’, I.M. & Kucherenko, S., 2009. "Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(10), pages 3009-3017.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Jun & Wang, Ding, 2019. "Structural reliability analysis based on polynomial chaos, Voronoi cells and dimension reduction technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 329-340.
    2. Vivier, Stephane, 2021. "Graphical predetermination of optimal machine designs by iso-performance configuration modeling," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 165-183.
    3. Ökten, Giray & Liu, Yaning, 2021. "Randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods in global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. Xu, Jun & Kong, Fan, 2018. "A new unequal-weighted sampling method for efficient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 94-102.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Becker, William, 2020. "Metafunctions for benchmarking in sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    3. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Wenjie & Wang, Donghui & Zhao, Kun & Zhang, Weihua, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis using orthogonal augmented radial basis function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 291-302.
    4. Konakli, Katerina & Sudret, Bruno, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using low-rank tensor approximations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 64-83.
    5. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    6. Lambert, Romain S.C. & Lemke, Frank & Kucherenko, Sergei S. & Song, Shufang & Shah, Nilay, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using sparse high dimensional model representations generated by the group method of data handling," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 42-54.
    7. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis: a generalized, unbiased and optimal estimator of total-effect variance," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 361-386, March.
    8. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    9. Ge, Qiao & Ciuffo, Biagio & Menendez, Monica, 2015. "Combining screening and metamodel-based methods: An efficient sequential approach for the sensitivity analysis of model outputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 334-344.
    10. Buzzard, Gregery T., 2012. "Global sensitivity analysis using sparse grid interpolation and polynomial chaos," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 82-89.
    11. Kucherenko, Sergei & Song, Shufang & Wang, Lu, 2019. "Quantile based global sensitivity measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 35-48.
    12. Deman, G. & Konakli, K. & Sudret, B. & Kerrou, J. & Perrochet, P. & Benabderrahmane, H., 2016. "Using sparse polynomial chaos expansions for the global sensitivity analysis of groundwater lifetime expectancy in a multi-layered hydrogeological model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 156-169.
    13. Oladyshkin, S. & Nowak, W., 2012. "Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-190.
    14. Lamboni, M. & Iooss, B. & Popelin, A.-L. & Gamboa, F., 2013. "Derivative-based global sensitivity measures: General links with Sobol’ indices and numerical tests," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 45-54.
    15. Sudret, B. & Mai, C.V., 2015. "Computing derivative-based global sensitivity measures using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 241-250.
    16. Anstett-Collin, F. & Goffart, J. & Mara, T. & Denis-Vidal, L., 2015. "Sensitivity analysis of complex models: Coping with dynamic and static inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 268-275.
    17. Azzini, Ivano & Rosati, Rossana, 2021. "Sobol’ main effect index: an Innovative Algorithm (IA) using Dynamic Adaptive Variances," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    18. Sinan Xiao & Zhenzhou Lu & Pan Wang, 2018. "Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Distance Components Decomposition," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2703-2721, December.
    19. Kucherenko, S. & Delpuech, B. & Iooss, B. & Tarantola, S., 2015. "Application of the control variate technique to estimation of total sensitivity indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 251-259.
    20. Roustant, O. & Fruth, J. & Iooss, B. & Kuhnt, S., 2014. "Crossed-derivative based sensitivity measures for interaction screening," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-118.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:152:y:2016:i:c:p:281-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.