IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reacre/v30y2018i2p112-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An examination of state and local government pension underfunding – Implications and guidance for governance and regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Foltin, Craig

Abstract

State and local government pension underfunding has become a major focus of public policy debate due in large part to recent Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) actions that have brought national attention to the issue. The extent of these plans underfunding has been debated, along with the necessity for state government intervention and the level of regulatory actions that should be enacted by state legislatures. State and local public pension plans do not fall under the enumerated powers of the federal government in the Constitution and are therefore left to each individual state to regulate. The amount of plan underfunding and enacted public policy by state varies greatly. Additionally, in contrast to numerous state balanced-budget laws, legal directives for fully funding public pensions are virtually non-existent. This paper analyzes the state and local public pension crisis, examines current and long-term risk, studies public employee fiscal conditions, considers the societal impacts of these plans, considers the strengths and weakness of pension plan types, recommends public policy and regulation, and offers strategies for managers, board members, and public officials to adopt.

Suggested Citation

  • Foltin, Craig, 2018. "An examination of state and local government pension underfunding – Implications and guidance for governance and regulation," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 112-120.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:30:y:2018:i:2:p:112-120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.racreg.2018.09.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045718300274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.racreg.2018.09.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fried, Abraham & Davis-Friday, Paquita & Davis, Harry Z., 2014. "The impact of duration on management's discount rate choice," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 217-221.
    2. Houmes, Robert & Boylan, Robert & Crosby, William, 2012. "On the value relevance of SFAS No. 158," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 112-114.
    3. Shaw, Kenneth W., 2008. "Revised pension rules and the cost of debt," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 3-25.
    4. Laura D. Quinby & Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher & Jean-Pierre Aubry, "undated". "How Have Pension Cuts Affected Public Sector Competitiveness?," Issues in Brief ibslp59, Center for Retirement Research.
    5. Foltin, Craig, 2017. "The role of federal regulation in state and local governments and the potential impact of new reforms: An assessment of the effectiveness of reporting, disclosure, and funding," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 19-29.
    6. Bauman, Mark P. & Shaw, Kenneth W., 2016. "Harmonizing pension accounting: Income statement effects of applying IAS19R to U.S. firms," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lagrange, Bruce & Viger, Chantal & Anandarajan, Asokan, 2015. "Contingency liabilities: The effect of three alternative reporting styles," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 119-128.
    2. James P. Naughton, 2019. "Regulatory oversight and trade-offs in earnings management: evidence from pension accounting," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 456-490, June.
    3. Atanasova, Christina & Hrazdil, Karel, 2010. "Why do healthy firms freeze their defined-benefit pension plans?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 293-303.
    4. Divya Anantharaman & Feng Gao & Hariom Manchiraju, 2022. "Does social responsibility begin at home? The relation between firms’ pension policies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 76-121, March.
    5. Bauman, Mark P. & Shaw, Kenneth W., 2016. "Balance sheet classification and the valuation of deferred taxes," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 77-85.
    6. Du, Hui & Li, Sherry Fang & Xu, Randall Zhaohui, 2014. "Adjustment of valuation inputs and its effect on value relevance of fair value measurement," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 54-66.
    7. Fried, Abraham & Davis-Friday, Paquita & Davis, Harry Z., 2014. "The impact of duration on management's discount rate choice," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 217-221.
    8. Comprix, Joseph & Guo, Jun & Zhang, Yan & Zhou, Nan, 2017. "Setting expected rates of return on pension plan assets: New evidence on the influence of audit committee accounting experts," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 159-166.
    9. Heflin, Frank & Shaw, Kenneth W. & Wild, John J., 2011. "Credit ratings and disclosure channels," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 20-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:30:y:2018:i:2:p:112-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-accounting-regulation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.