On a multi-product model of lot-sizing with quality costs
AbstractIn this note we consider a multi-product environment where production lot-sizing and investing for quality improvement in several production processes are desired. We develop a mathematical model for addressing this important problem. We use our model to calculate the optimal lot-sizes and the optimal allocation of investment across products in the presence of a budget constraint. We quantify quality loss costs more effectively than the traditionally used Taguchi loss function, in the context of production lot-sizing, by using a modified form of the reflected normal loss function and develop several insights into the nature of the optimal solution. Finally, we show that our model and overall method can be readily adapted to a spreadsheet-based environment and consequently have practical and managerial relevance.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal International Journal of Production Economics.
Volume (Year): 112 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 (April)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Kulkarni, Shailesh & Prybutok, Victor, 2004. "Process investment and loss functions: Models and analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(1), pages 120-129, August.
- Papachristos, S. & Konstantaras, I., 2006. "Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 148-154, March.
- Ganeshan, Ram & Kulkarni, Shailesh & Boone, Tonya, 2001. "Production economics and process quality: A Taguchi perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-3), pages 343-350, May.
- Ouyang, Liang-Yuh & Wu, Kun-Shan & Ho, Chia-Huei, 2007. "An integrated vendor-buyer inventory model with quality improvement and lead time reduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 349-358, July.
- Dey, Oshmita & Chakraborty, Debjani, 2011. "A fuzzy random continuous review inventory system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 101-106, July.
- Diaby, Moustapha & Cruz, Jose M. & Nsakanda, Aaron L., 2013. "Shortening cycle times in multi-product, capacitated production environments through quality level improvements and setup reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 526-535.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.