IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v522y2019icp54-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting popularity via a generative model with adaptive peeking window

Author

Listed:
  • Bao, Zemin
  • Liu, Yun
  • Zhang, Zhenjiang
  • Liu, Hui
  • Cheng, Junjun

Abstract

Predicting the popularity of online content is an important issue for uncovering rules governing collective human behaviors in networks. Also, content popularity prediction finds application in an array of areas. In this paper, we propose a generative approach using a Hawkes process, the purpose of which is to predict the eventual popularity of online content from the observed initial period of the information cascade. Our approach is distinguished from existing approaches via its ability to explore an adaptive peeking window and its added remarkable predictive power that was inherited from the feature-driven method. Further, we proposed a procedure for exploring an adaptive peeking window, which allows us to answer the question, “How can we obtain the most effective part of the history to make an accurate prediction?” And the added predictive layer bridges the gap between the generative method and the feature-driven method. Empirical studies on real world datasets demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperformed the existing approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Bao, Zemin & Liu, Yun & Zhang, Zhenjiang & Liu, Hui & Cheng, Junjun, 2019. "Predicting popularity via a generative model with adaptive peeking window," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 54-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:522:y:2019:i:c:p:54-68
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437119301396
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohler, G. O. & Short, M. B. & Brantingham, P. J. & Schoenberg, F. P. & Tita, G. E., 2011. "Self-Exciting Point Process Modeling of Crime," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 100-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anatoliy Swishchuk & Aiden Huffman, 2020. "General Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Dewei Wang & Chendi Jiang & Chanseok Park, 2019. "Reliability analysis of load-sharing systems with memory," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 341-360, April.
    3. Cavaliere, Giuseppe & Lu, Ye & Rahbek, Anders & Stærk-Østergaard, Jacob, 2023. "Bootstrap inference for Hawkes and general point processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 133-165.
    4. Mohler, George, 2014. "Marked point process hotspot maps for homicide and gun crime prediction in Chicago," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 491-497.
    5. Boswijk, H. Peter & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Yang, Xiye, 2018. "Testing for self-excitation in jumps," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 256-266.
    6. Chenlong Li & Zhanjie Song & Wenjun Wang, 2020. "Space–time inhomogeneous background intensity estimators for semi-parametric space–time self-exciting point process models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 945-967, August.
    7. Sebastian Meyer & Johannes Elias & Michael Höhle, 2012. "A Space–Time Conditional Intensity Model for Invasive Meningococcal Disease Occurrence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 607-616, June.
    8. Thibault Jaisson & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2015. "Rough fractional diffusions as scaling limits of nearly unstable heavy tailed Hawkes processes," Papers 1504.03100, arXiv.org.
    9. Ulrich Horst & Wei Xu, 2024. "Functional Limit Theorems for Hawkes Processes," Papers 2401.11495, arXiv.org.
    10. Mateo Dulce Rubio, 2019. "Predicting criminal behavior with Levy flights using real data from Bogota," Documentos de Trabajo 17347, Quantil.
    11. Lizhen Xu & Jason A. Duan & Andrew Whinston, 2014. "Path to Purchase: A Mutually Exciting Point Process Model for Online Advertising and Conversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1392-1412, June.
    12. Amanda S. Hering & Sean Bair, 2014. "Characterizing spatial and chronological target selection of serial offenders," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 123-140, January.
    13. Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness & Ahmed A. Ewees & Hong Fan & Mohamed Abd Elaziz, 2020. "Optimized Forecasting Method for Weekly Influenza Confirmed Cases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    14. Angelos Dassios & Hongbiao Zhao, 2017. "A Generalized Contagion Process With An Application To Credit Risk," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-33, February.
    15. Maillart, Thomas & Sornette, Didier, 2019. "Aristotle vs. Ringelmann: On superlinear production in open source software," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 964-972.
    16. Ginger Saltos & Mihaela Cocea, 2017. "An Exploration of Crime Prediction Using Data Mining on Open Data," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1155-1181, September.
    17. Samuel N. Cohen & Robert J. Elliott, 2013. "Filters and smoothers for self-exciting Markov modulated counting processes," Papers 1311.6257, arXiv.org.
    18. Laurent Lesage & Madalina Deaconu & Antoine Lejay & Jorge Augusto Meira & Geoffrey Nichil & Radu State, 2020. "Hawkes processes framework with a Gamma density as excitation function: application to natural disasters for insurance," Working Papers hal-03040090, HAL.
    19. Sobin Joseph & Shashi Jain, 2023. "A neural network based model for multi-dimensional nonlinear Hawkes processes," Papers 2303.03073, arXiv.org.
    20. Didier Sornette & Thomas Maillart & Giacomo Ghezzi, 2014. "How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:522:y:2019:i:c:p:54-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.