IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v48y2014icp18-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can fisheries management be quantified?

Author

Listed:
  • Hentati-Sundberg, J.
  • Hjelm, J.

Abstract

Policy efforts to reduce fisheries impact have often created micro-management. Detailed regulations are restricting the fishing industry, and are also acknowledged to limit the progress towards sustainable management. Industry representatives, political bodies and scientists have therefore argued for more simplicity and transparency. Here, fisheries management is quantified in terms of trends in regulations for different Swedish fisheries in the Baltic Sea during the period 1995–2009. The results suggest that many fisheries are suffering from increased micro-management, but interestingly some fisheries showing a different trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Hentati-Sundberg, J. & Hjelm, J., 2014. "Can fisheries management be quantified?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 18-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:48:y:2014:i:c:p:18-20
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X14000712
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tony Pitcher & Daniela Kalikoski & Ganapathiraju Pramod & Katherine Short, 2009. "Not honouring the code," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7230), pages 658-659, February.
    2. Linke, Sebastian & Jentoft, Svein, 2013. "A communicative turnaround: Shifting the burden of proof in European fisheries governance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 337-345.
    3. Cullis-Suzuki, Sarika & Pauly, Daniel, 2010. "Failing the high seas: A global evaluation of regional fisheries management organizations," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1036-1042, September.
    4. Jentoft, Svein & McCay, Bonnie J. & Wilson, Douglas C., 0. "Social theory and fisheries co-management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4-5), pages 423-436, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crow White & Christopher Costello, 2014. "Close the High Seas to Fishing?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-5, March.
    2. Kerri Brick & Martine Visser & Justine Burns, 2012. "Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(1), pages 133-152.
    3. Hussain Sinan & Megan Bailey, 2020. "Understanding Barriers in Indian Ocean Tuna Commission Allocation Negotiations on Fishing Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Teh, Louise S.L. & Teh, Lydia C.L. & Rashid Sumaila, U., 2014. "Time preference of small-scale fishers in open access and traditionally managed reef fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 222-231.
    5. Galaz, Victor & Crona, Beatrice & Österblom, Henrik & Olsson, Per & Folke, Carl, 2012. "Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries — Emerging governance of climate change–ocean acidification–marine biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-32.
    6. Barbara Quimby & Arielle Levine, 2018. "Participation, Power, and Equity: Examining Three Key Social Dimensions of Fisheries Comanagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Asproudis, Elias & Filippiadis, Eleftherios, 2021. "Bargaining for Community Fishing Quotas," MPRA Paper 107409, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Matz-Lück, Nele & Fuchs, Johannes, 2014. "The impact of OSPAR on protected area management beyond national jurisdiction: Effective regional cooperation or a network of paper parks?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 155-166.
    9. Changping Zhao & Maliyamu Sadula & Xiangmeng Huang & Yali Yang & Yu Gong & Shuai Yang, 2022. "The Game Model of Blue Carbon Collaboration along MSR—From the Regret Theory Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Tyler D Eddy & Jonathan P A Gardner & Alejandro Pérez-Matus, 2010. "Applying Fishers' Ecological Knowledge to Construct Past and Future Lobster Stocks in the Juan Fernández Archipelago, Chile," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Martin Bohle & Cornelia E. Nauen & Eduardo Marone, 2019. "Ethics to Intersect Civic Participation and Formal Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Bianca Haas & Marcus Haward & Jeffrey McGee & Aysha Fleming, 2021. "Explicit targets and cooperation: regional fisheries management organizations and the sustainable development goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 133-145, March.
    13. Quentin Grafton, R., 2010. "Adaptation to climate change in marine capture fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 606-615, May.
    14. Whitehouse, George A. & Aydin, Kerim Y., 2020. "Assessing the sensitivity of three Alaska marine food webs to perturbations: an example of Ecosim simulations using Rpath," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    15. Jacques, Peter J., 2015. "Are world fisheries a global panarchy?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 165-170.
    16. McCay, Bonnie J. & Micheli, Fiorenza & Ponce-Díaz, Germán & Murray, Grant & Shester, Geoff & Ramirez-Sanchez, Saudiel & Weisman, Wendy, 2014. "Cooperatives, concessions, and co-management on the Pacific coast of Mexico," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 49-59.
    17. Thomas, Alyssa S. & Milfont, Taciano L. & Gavin, Michael C., 2015. "What determines fishers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards regulations? A case study from the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 547-554.
    18. Eliasen, Søren Q. & Hegland, Troels J. & Raakjær, Jesper, 2015. "Decentralising: The implementation of regionalisation and co-management under the post-2013 Common Fisheries Policy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 224-232.
    19. Gars, Johan & Spiro, Daniel, 2014. "Uninsurance through Trade," Memorandum 13/2014, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    20. Øistein Harsem & Alf Hoel, 2013. "Climate change and adaptive capacity in fisheries management: the case of Norway," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 49-63, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:48:y:2014:i:c:p:18-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.