IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v75y2022ics030142072100516x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can the state rights be calculated by considering a high share of state right in mining operating costs in Turkey?

Author

Listed:
  • Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz

Abstract

As it is applied in many world countries, state right is also charged for each production after mining activities in Turkey. State right is charged at varying rates according to mineral groups. In the development of mining legislation, these rates and state right calculation methods also underwent a change. The most important among these is switching to the method of demanding state rights over pit sale price instead of the method of demanding state rights over annual operating balance sheet gross profit in Turkey since 2004. As a result, despite the incentive discounts in the state right rates of mineral groups, the state right rates increased several times. The state brought an increase in the state right rates of metallic minerals in particular by considering the decrease in the number of mining operation permits in the last yearsAccording to the latest legislation, state rights are charged at rates varying between 0.5 and 18.75% according to mineral groups. Envisaging the determination of the equal pit sale price in state rights and granting the administration the discretionary power on this issue also creates a hidden increase in these rates. All these increases enabled the state to charge more state rights from the mining sector. State rights accrual based on US$ increased 8 times from 2004 to 2019, and ∼4 times per one mining operation permit. However, it is reported as news in the Turkish public that mining enterprises only give a 2–4% of share as a state right and do not make any other contributions apart from this. By using “SurveyMonkey”, permanent supervisors working in the mining enterprises were asked questions how much the share of state rights paid by the enterprises actually were. The state right cost of each mining enterprise was proportioned to the average annual operating costs of these mining enterprises. The results, along with varying based on the different mineral groups, show that the state rights take a high degree of share in mining operating costs in Turkey. In addition, the state right rates in Turkey are quite high compared to other countries in the world that charge state rights over the pit sale prices. Above all, not only the state right in Turkey but when considered with all land-use fees charged from mining operating activities, enterprises economically have difficulties with maintaining the operability of available mining investments in the presence of these costs they pay. For these reasons, in this study, considering the applications in other world countries regarding the state right rates and calculation methods envisaged in the legislation, solutions are put forward. If a discount is made at reasonable rates in other fees paid by mining enterprises, perhaps there will be no need to make discounts in state right rates. However, not giving an increase in state right rates is suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2022. "How can the state rights be calculated by considering a high share of state right in mining operating costs in Turkey?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s030142072100516x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142072100516X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Celine de Quatrebarbes & Bertrand Laporte, 2015. "What do we know about the mineral resource rent sharing in Africa?," CERDI Working papers halshs-01146279, HAL.
    2. Ebert, Laura & La Menza, Tania, 2015. "Chile, copper and resource revenue: A holistic approach to assessing commodity dependence," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 101-111.
    3. Smith, James L., 2013. "Issues in extractive resource taxation: A review of research methods and models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 320-331.
    4. Söderholm, Kristina & Söderholm, Patrik & Helenius, Heidi & Pettersson, Maria & Viklund, Roine & Masloboev, Vladimir & Mingaleva, Tatiana & Petrov, Viktor, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness in the mining industry: Permitting processes with special focus on Finland, Sweden and Russia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-142.
    5. M. H. I. Dore, 1987. "Mineral Taxation in Jamaica: An Oligopoly Confronts Taxes on Resource Rents — and Prevails," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 179-203, April.
    6. Fraser, Rob & Kingwell, Ross, 1997. "Can expected tax revenue be increased by an investment-preserving switch from ad valorem royalties to a resource rent tax?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 103-108, September.
    7. James Otto & Craig Andrews & Fred Cawood & Michael Doggett & Pietro Guj & Frank Stermole & John Stermole & John Tilton, 2006. "Mining Royalties : A Global Study of Their Impact on Investors, Government, and Civil Society," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7105, December.
    8. Lilford, Eric V., 2017. "Quantitative impacts of royalties on mineral projects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 369-377.
    9. Magnus Ericsson & Olof Löf, 2019. "Mining’s contribution to national economies between 1996 and 2016," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 32(2), pages 223-250, July.
    10. Abdelwahed, Loujaina, 2020. "More oil, more or less taxes? New evidence on the impact of resource revenue on domestic tax revenue," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Balde, Mamadou Tanou, 2020. "A brief history of time: Taxation and mineral production in developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Bradley, Paul G. & Helliwell, John F. & Livernois, John R., 1981. "Efficient taxation of resource income : The case of copper mining in British Columbia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 161-170, September.
    13. Garnaut, Ross & Clunies Ross, Anthony, 1979. "The Neutrality of the Resource Rent Tax," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 55(150), pages 193-201, September.
    14. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Kural, Orhan, 2020. "The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Yıldırım, Seda & Gedikli, Ayfer & Erdoğan, Seyfettin & Yıldırım, Durmuş Çağrı, 2020. "Natural resources rents-financial development nexus: Evidence from sixteen developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. George Fane, 2012. "Allocating and taxing rights to state-owned minerals," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 173-189, August.
    17. Kulczycka, Joanna & Wirth, Herbert & Hausner, Jerzy, 2017. "Polish tax policy - its impact on the mineral sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 72-80.
    18. Brannon, Gerard M, 1975. "U.S. Taxes on Energy Resources," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 65(2), pages 397-404, May.
    19. Ross Garnaut & Anthony Clunies Ross, 1979. "The Neutrality of the Resource Rent Tax," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 55(3), pages 193-201, September.
    20. Schantz, Radford Jr, 1994. "Purpose and effects of a royalty on public land minerals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 35-48, March.
    21. Cawood, F.T., 2010. "The South African mineral and petroleum resources royalty act--Background and fundamental principles," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 199-209, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2022. "Considering the recent increase in license fees in Turkey, how can the negative effect of the fees on the mining operating costs be reduced?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2023. "How can shares be increased for indigenous peoples in state rights paid by mining companies? An education incentive through direct contribution to the people," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2022. "Supervisor fund expectation for the guarantee of salaries in the presence of the effect of permanent supervisor salaries on mining operating costs in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Bertrand Laporte & Celine de Quatrebarbes & Yannick Bouterige, 2022. "Tax design and rent sharing in mining sector: Evidence from African gold‐producing countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 1176-1196, August.
    5. Bertrand Laporte & Céline de Quatrebarbes & Yannick Bouterige, 2019. "Rent sharing and progressivity of tax regimes in the mining sector: An analysis of 21 African gold-producing countries [Partage de la rente et progressivité des régimes fiscaux dans le secteur mini," CERDI Working papers halshs-02103047, HAL.
    6. Amos James Ibrahim-Shwilima & Hideki Konishi, 2014. "The Impact of Tax Concessions on Extraction of Non-renewable Resources:An Application to Gold Mining in Tanzania," Working Papers 1403, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    7. Castillo, Emilio, 2021. "The impacts of profit-based royalties on early-stage mineral exploration," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Fraser, Rob W., 1999. "The state of resource taxation in Australia: 'An inexcusable folly for the nation'?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(3), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Fraser, Rob W., 1998. "Lease allocation systems, risk aversion and the resource rent tax," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(2), pages 1-16.
    10. Fraser, Rob W., 1999. "An analysis of the Western Australian gold royalty," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(1), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Smith, B., 1999. "The Impossibility of a Neutral Resource Rent Tax," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 1999-380, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    12. Bergholt, Drago & Røisland, Øistein & Sveen, Tommy & Torvik, Ragnar, 2023. "Monetary policy when export revenues drop," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Celine de Quatrebarbes & Bertrand Laporte, 2015. "What do we know about the mineral resource rent sharing in Africa?," CERDI Working papers halshs-01146279, HAL.
    14. Bertrand LAPORTE & Céline DE QUATREBARBES & Yannick BOUTERIGE, 2019. "Partage de la rente et progressivité des régimes fiscaux dans le secteur minier : une analyse sur 21 pays africains producteurs d’or," Working Papers P252, FERDI.
    15. Bourgain, Arnaud & Zanaj, Skerdilajda, 2020. "A tax competition approach to resource taxation in developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Fraser, Rob & Kingwell, Ross, 1997. "Can expected tax revenue be increased by an investment-preserving switch from ad valorem royalties to a resource rent tax?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 103-108, September.
    17. Asatryan, Zareh & Baskaran, Thushyanthan & Birkholz, Carlo & Hufschmidt, Patrick, 2021. "Regional redistribution of mineral resource wealth in Africa," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-032, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Bertinelli, Luisito & Bourgain, Arnaud & Zanaj, Skerdilajda, 2022. "Taxes and declared profits: Evidence from gold mines in Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Olav Lundstøl & Jan Isaksen, 2018. "Zambia’s mining windfall tax," WIDER Working Paper Series 51, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Abdul Manaf, Nor Aziah & Mas'ud, Abdulsalam & Ishak, Zuaini & Saad, Natrah & Russell, Alex, 2016. "Towards establishing a scale for assessing the attractiveness of petroleum fiscal regimes – Evidence from Malaysia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 253-261.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s030142072100516x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.