IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v16y1988i1p11-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour productivity: Is the such a measure? (The case of greek industry)

Author

Listed:
  • Cosmetatos, G
  • Kokosis, A
  • Lipovatz-Kremezi, D
  • Mandaraka, M

Abstract

Even when concentrating on the simplest of partial productivity measures, the productivity of labour, the analyst is faced with a wide choice of alternative definitions and calculation possibilities. Some of them require a limited amount of data, can be implemented straightaway and are therefore used as up-to-date indicators of labour productivity trends. Others can only be implemented at a later stage, when the necessary data become available; their historical value is often considered of insufficient interest to justify the effort involved in their evaluation. This paper sets out to investigate the sensitivity of labour productivity measures to issues of definition and measurement through implementation to sectors of Greek industry. A number of alternatives were tried (many more were not pursued due to data unavailability) and some of the results obtained are presented. The findings seem to point to two conclusions: (a) The easy-to-calculate, up-to-date measure may well not reflect actual labour productivity changes; the dangers that this entails for the success or otherwise of productivity-linked payment schemes, performance evaluation and decision making are obvious. (b) It would appear possible to verify almost any a priori assessment of labour productivity growth rates by simply choosing the appropriate definition, method of measurement and industry stratum.

Suggested Citation

  • Cosmetatos, G & Kokosis, A & Lipovatz-Kremezi, D & Mandaraka, M, 1988. "Labour productivity: Is the such a measure? (The case of greek industry)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:16:y:1988:i:1:p:11-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(88)90003-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:16:y:1988:i:1:p:11-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.