IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v123y2024ics0305048323001366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust actions for improving supply chain resilience and viability

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Ming
  • Ding, Yueyu
  • Chu, Feng
  • Dolgui, Alexandre
  • Zheng, Feifeng

Abstract

It is vital for supply chains (SCs) to survive the dramatic and long-term impacts from severe disruptive events, such as COVID-19 pandemic. SC viability, an extension of SC resilience, is increasingly attracting attention from both academics and practitioners. To improve SC viability, the government can perform a series of costly interventions on SCs. Due to data scarcity on unpredictable disruptive events, especially under the pandemic, the information related to SC partners may not be accurately obtained. In this paper, we investigate a novel SC resilience and viability improving problem under severe disruptive events, in which only the probability intervals of SC partners’ states are known. The problem consists of the selection of appropriate intervention actions, respecting a limited capital budget. The objective is to minimize the worst-case disruption risk of the manufacturer. Specifically, Causal Bayesian Network (CBN) is applied to quantify the SC ripple effects; Do-calculus technique is used to measure the benefits of government intervention actions; and robust optimization is employed to minimize the disruption risk under the worst-case condition. For the problem, a new robust optimization model that combines the CBN and the Do-calculus is constructed. Based on analyses of problem features, an efficient problem-specific branch-and-bound (PS-BAB) algorithm is proposed to solve the problem exactly. Experimental results show the efficiency of our methodology and managerial insights are drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Ming & Ding, Yueyu & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Zheng, Feifeng, 2024. "Robust actions for improving supply chain resilience and viability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:123:y:2024:i:c:s0305048323001366
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2023.102972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048323001366
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2023.102972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:123:y:2024:i:c:s0305048323001366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.