IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v82y2022ics0047235222000964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender differences in serious police misconduct: A machine-learning analysis of the New York Police Department (NYPD)

Author

Listed:
  • Cubitt, Timothy I.C.
  • Gaub, Janne E.
  • Holtfreter, Kristy

Abstract

Despite a considerable body of research on police misconduct, findings have been mixed, with little consensus regarding its causes and best practices for prevention. Emerging research has focused on the role of gender in understanding and preventing misconduct. The current study examines the extent to which the features associated with serious misconduct differ between male and female officers.

Suggested Citation

  • Cubitt, Timothy I.C. & Gaub, Janne E. & Holtfreter, Kristy, 2022. "Gender differences in serious police misconduct: A machine-learning analysis of the New York Police Department (NYPD)," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:82:y:2022:i:c:s0047235222000964
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235222000964
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Swamy, Anand & Knack, Stephen & Lee, Young & Azfar, Omar, 2001. "Gender and corruption," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 25-55, February.
    2. Pogarsky, Greg & Piquero, Alex R., 2004. "Studying the reach of deterrence: Can deterrence theory help explain police misconduct?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 371-386.
    3. Edika G. Quispe-Torreblanca & Neil Stewart, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Causal peer effects in police misconduct," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 762-762, July.
    4. Hickman, Matthew J. & Piquero, Nicole L. & Piquero, Alex R., 2004. "The validity of Niederhoffer's cynicism scale," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-13.
    5. Edika G. Quispe-Torreblanca & Neil Stewart, 2019. "Causal peer effects in police misconduct," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 797-807, August.
    6. Holtfreter, Kristy, 2005. "Is occupational fraud "typical" white-collar crime? A comparison of individual and organizational characteristics," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 353-365.
    7. Shjarback, John A. & Nix, Justin, 2020. "Considering violence against police by citizen race/ethnicity to contextualize representation in officer-involved shootings," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Kristy Holtfreter, 2015. "General theory, gender-specific theory, and white-collar crime," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(4), pages 422-431, October.
    9. Micucci, Anthony J. & Gomme, Ian M., 2005. "American police and subcultural support for the use of excessive force," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 487-500.
    10. Kosuke Imai & Gary King & Elizabeth A. Stuart, 2008. "Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(2), pages 481-502, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Poteyeva, Margarita & Sun, Ivan Y., 2009. "Gender differences in police officers' attitudes: Assessing current empirical evidence," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 512-522, September.
    2. Donner, Christopher M. & Maskaly, Jon & Thompson, Kanani N., 2018. "Self-control and the police code of silence: Examining the unwillingness to report fellow officers' misbehavior among a multi-agency sample of police recruits," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 11-19.
    3. Adams, Ian T. & McCrain, Joshua & Schiff, Daniel S. & Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson & Mourtgos, Scott M., 2022. "Public Pressure or Peer Influence: What Shapes Police Executives' Views on Civilian Oversight?," SocArXiv mdu96, Center for Open Science.
    4. Timofeyev, Yuriy, 2015. "Analysis of predictors of organizational losses due to occupational corruption," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 630-641.
    5. Hunt, Jennifer & Laszlo, Sonia, 2005. "Bribery: Who Pays, Who Refuses, What are the Payoffs?," CEPR Discussion Papers 5251, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Dendi Ramdani & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2012. "The Shareholder–Manager Relationship and Its Impact on the Likelihood of Firm Bribery," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 495-507, July.
    7. Astrid Sneyers & Anneleen Vandeplas, 2013. "Girl Power in Agricultural Production: How Much Does it Yield? A Case-Study on the Dairy Sector in India," LICOS Discussion Papers 34113, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    8. Hunt, Jennifer, 2004. "Trust and Bribery: The Role of the Quid Pro Quo and the Link With Crime," CEPR Discussion Papers 4567, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Marco Caliendo & Stefan Tübbicke, 2020. "New evidence on long-term effects of start-up subsidies: matching estimates and their robustness," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1605-1631, October.
    10. I. Chatterjee & R. Ray, 2012. "Does the evidence on corruption depend on how it is measured? Results from a cross-country study on microdata sets," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(25), pages 3215-3227, September.
    11. Mavisakalyan, Astghik & Tarverdi, Yashar, 2019. "Gender and climate change: Do female parliamentarians make difference?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 151-164.
    12. Kyunga Na & Young-Hee Kang & Yang Sok Kim, 2018. "The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Corruption of Firms in BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India & China)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Lee, Hoon & Vaughn, Michael S. & Lim, Hyeyoung, 2014. "The impact of neighborhood crime levels on police use of force: An examination at micro and meso levels," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 491-499.
    14. Huther, Jeff & Shah, Anwar, 2000. "Anti-corruption policies and programs : a framework for evaluation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2501, The World Bank.
    15. Mohamed Dridi, 2014. "Corruption and Education: Empirical Evidence," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 4(3), pages 476-493.
    16. Wendy Chan, 2018. "Applications of Small Area Estimation to Generalization With Subclassification by Propensity Scores," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(2), pages 182-224, April.
    17. Fang,Sheng & Goh,Chorching & Roberts,Mark & Xu,L. Colin & Zeufack,Albert G., 2020. "Female Business Leaders, Business and Cultural Environment, and Productivity around the World," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9275, The World Bank.
    18. Thushyanthan Baskaran & Sonia Bhalotra & Brian Min & Yogesh Uppal, 2018. "Women legislators and economic performance," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-47, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. You, Jong-Sung & Khagram, Sanjeev, 2004. "Inequality and Corruption," Working Paper Series rwp04-001, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    20. Inessa Love & Boris Nikolaev & Chandra Dhakal, 2024. "The well-being of women entrepreneurs: the role of gender inequality and gender roles," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 325-352, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:82:y:2022:i:c:s0047235222000964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.