IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v37yi3p273-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethnicity, trust, and acceptance of authority among police officers

Author

Listed:
  • De Angelis, Joseph
  • Kupchik, Aaron

Abstract

This article examines the factors that influence the willingness of police officers to comply with decisions made by police command staff. In particular, this research focuses on the extent to which officer ethnicity interacts with perceptions of procedural justice in influencing officer compliance. The data for this study were drawn from an anonymous mailed survey (n = 648) examining officer attitudes toward the complaint investigation process in one large municipal police department. Structural equation modeling demonstrates that ethnicity does influence officer compliance, but only weakly and indirectly. Latino/a officers are less likely to report trust in police internal affairs than White officers, and thus somewhat less likely report that they are willing to comply with command staff decisions. Other factors, such as morale, perceptions of procedural justice, and rank, prove to be much more powerful predictors of officer compliance than ethnicity.

Suggested Citation

  • De Angelis, Joseph & Kupchik, Aaron, 2009. "Ethnicity, trust, and acceptance of authority among police officers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 273-279, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:37:y::i:3:p:273-279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(09)00045-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wells, William, 2007. "Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police-citizen contacts," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 612-621, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaochen Hu & Xudong Zhang & Nicholas Lovrich, 2021. "Public perceptions of police behavior during traffic stops: logistic regression and machine learning approaches compared," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 355-380, May.
    2. Bolger, Michelle A. & Lytle, Daniel J. & Bolger, P. Colin, 2021. "What matters in citizen satisfaction with police: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Abril, Veronica & Perez-Vincent, Santiago & Tobon, Santiago & Vanegas-Arias, Martin, 2022. "How to measure public trust in the police? A framework with an application for Colombia," SocArXiv 89shw, Center for Open Science.
    4. Yue Yuan & Yuning Wu & Claudio Vera Sanchez, 2022. "Immigrant status and neighborhood context on perceptions of police procedural justice," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(7), pages 1659-1672, December.
    5. Ana Isabel Sani & Vanessa Azevedo & Daniela Paulo & Mariana Magalhães & Laura M. Nunes, 2022. "Satisfaction with the Police: Perceptions and Related Variables from an Urban Community Sample," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Ferdik, Frank & Frogge, George & Cooney, Mikaela, 2022. "Exploring further determinants of citizen satisfaction with the police: The role of strain," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Lorraine Mazerolle & Sarah Bennett & Matthew Manning & Patricia Ferguson & Elise Sargeant, 2010. "PROTOCOL: Legitimacy in Policing," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:37:y::i:3:p:273-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.