IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v174y2024ics0148296324000419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust asymmetry and changes in supplier opportunism: An institutional contingency view

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Mengyang
  • Zheng Zhou, Kevin
  • Bai, Xuan
  • Li, Jiaxuan

Abstract

Despite the importance of trust and the dyadic nature of exchange relationships, research on how differing trust perceptions between partners affect transactions is insufficient. Drawing on relational exchange theory, this study explores the effects of buyer trust asymmetry and supplier trust asymmetry on changes in supplier opportunism over time, and further examines the moderating roles of legal support and regulatory uncertainty. Empirical results from 229 buyer–supplier dyads in China reveal that when buyer trust surpasses supplier trust, trust asymmetry leads to increased supplier opportunism over time; yet when the supplier’s trust exceeds that of the buyer, trust asymmetry results in decreased supplier opportunism. Moreover, legal support weakens the effects of buyer and supplier trust asymmetry, and regulatory uncertainty magnifies the influence of buyer trust asymmetry. Our findings shed light on the complexity of interfirm trust and the dark side of business-to-business relationships, offering valuable insights for relationship marketing research.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Mengyang & Zheng Zhou, Kevin & Bai, Xuan & Li, Jiaxuan, 2024. "Trust asymmetry and changes in supplier opportunism: An institutional contingency view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:174:y:2024:i:c:s0148296324000419
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324000419
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:174:y:2024:i:c:s0148296324000419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.