IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v172y2024ics0148296323007907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can coffee shops draw customers back after COVID-19? the influence of psychological distance on coffee versus tea preference

Author

Listed:
  • Grossman, Ori
  • Rachamim, Matti

Abstract

The complex situation of COVID-19 raises the need for coffee entrepreneurs to be more innovative and apply strategies to enhance the attractiveness of coffee over other beverages, such as tea, and thereby increase their profits. According to recent studies, coffee and tea cues influence consumers’ psychological distance perspectivewith coffee cues tending to prompt psychological proximity and tea cues psychological distance. Such findings raise questions regarding the inverse relationship between psychological distance and coffee versus tea preference, which the present paper attempts to address. In seven experiments using different dimensions of psychological distance, the authors found that thepreference for coffee over tea appeared to decrease (increase) with psychological distance (proximity). The findings refute the notion that arousal level, level of knowledge or mood could account for the results. However, it was determined that regular coffee consumption moderates the influence of psychological distance on coffee versus tea preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Grossman, Ori & Rachamim, Matti, 2024. "How can coffee shops draw customers back after COVID-19? the influence of psychological distance on coffee versus tea preference," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:172:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323007907
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323007907
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:172:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323007907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.