IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v164y2023ics0148296323003119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrium blockchain adoption strategies for duopolistic competitive platforms with network effects

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Biao
  • Li, Hao
  • Zhang, Xiaodan
  • Alejandro, Thomas Brashear

Abstract

The emerging blockchain technology has created many novel applications for platform operations in the sharing economy. This study develops an analytical model to assess whether two traditional platforms should utilize private blockchains as an operational strategy, and how their decisions depend on the technology’s characteristics and market conditions. Results indicate that the difference in service quality between the two platforms plays a critical role in blockchain adoption decisions. Specifically, when the service quality difference is significant, the platform with high service quality should adopt blockchain technology, whereas the other platform should not. When the service quality difference is not significant, both platforms should make identical decisions. This study is the first to theoretically analyze price competition and blockchain adoption between two platforms with positive network effects, providing useful managerial implications for competitive platform operations of the sharing economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Biao & Li, Hao & Zhang, Xiaodan & Alejandro, Thomas Brashear, 2023. "Equilibrium blockchain adoption strategies for duopolistic competitive platforms with network effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:164:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323003119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323003119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:164:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323003119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.