IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v131y2021icp112-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain technology and modern slavery: Reducing deceptive recruitment in migrant worker populations

Author

Listed:
  • Christ, Katherine L
  • V Helliar, Christine

Abstract

Modern slavery, including forced labour, is a practice that impacts more than 40 million people, 20 million of whom are trapped in corporate supply chains. Migrant workers are disproportionately affected by this practice, who are often from developing countries and are vulnerable to exploitation through deceptive recruitment practices. With questions raised as to the efficacy of social audit and increasing pressure on governments and large businesses to identify and reduce the incidence of modern slavery in corporate activities, new approaches and tools are needed. The purpose of this paper is to offer a conceptual discussion as to how a relatively new technology, the blockchain, might be used to reduce vulnerability and risk in migrant worker populations. Limitations and directions for future research are also considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Christ, Katherine L & V Helliar, Christine, 2021. "Blockchain technology and modern slavery: Reducing deceptive recruitment in migrant worker populations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 112-120.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:131:y:2021:i:c:p:112-120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321002289
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papathanasiou, Angeliki & Cole, Rosanna & Murray, Philip, 2020. "The (non-)application of blockchain technology in the Greek shipping industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 927-938.
    2. Katherine Leanne Christ & Roger Leonard Burritt & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Accounting for work conditions from modern slavery to decent work," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1481-1504, July.
    3. Stephanie Ware Barrientos, 2013. "'Labour Chains': Analysing the Role of Labour Contractors in Global Production Networks," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1058-1071, August.
    4. Erica Russell & Jacquetta Lee & Roland Clift, 2018. "Can the SDGs Provide a Basis for Supply Chain Decisions in the Construction Sector?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sami Saad Alsemairi, 2023. "The Role of Digital Technologies in Combating Cyber-Trafficking in Persons Crimes," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(1), pages 1-49, February.
    2. Chiyin Chen & Yunting Feng & Bin Shen, 2022. "Managing Labor Sustainability in Digitalized Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Giuliano Sansone & Flavio Santalucia & Davide Viglialoro & Paolo Landoni, 2023. "Blockchain for social good and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from a case study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2182-2193, September.
    4. Goldberg, Mitchell & Schär, Fabian, 2023. "Metaverse governance: An empirical analysis of voting within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Marco Bellucci & Damiano Cesa Bianchi & Giacomo Manetti, 2021. "A literature review on blockchain in accounting research," Working Papers - Business wp2021_04.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    6. Christ, Katherine L. & Burritt, Roger L., 2023. "Exploring effectiveness of entity actions to eliminate modern slavery risk – Early Australian evidence," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    7. Qilong Cao & Jinglei Li & Hongru Zhang & Yue Liu & Xun Luo, 2022. "Blockchain and Firm Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margareet Visser & Matthew Alford, 2024. "Governance and Power Across Intersecting Value Chains: The Case of South African Apples," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 69-86, January.
    2. Gerhard REINECKE & Anne POSTHUMA, 2019. "The link between economic and social upgrading in global supply chains: Experiences from the Southern Cone," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 677-703, December.
    3. Matias Ramirez & Ian Clarke & Laurens Klerkx, 2018. "Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1314-1335, September.
    4. Rohit Agrawal & Abhijit Majumdar & Kirty Majumdar & Rakesh D. Raut & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2022. "Attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs) through supply chain practices and business strategies: A systematic review with bibliometric and network analyses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3669-3687, November.
    5. Diego Cagigas & Judith Clifton & Daniel Díaz-Fuentes & Marcos Fernández-Gutiérrez & Juan Echevarría-Cuenca & Celia Gilsanz-Gómez, 2022. "Explaining public officials’ opinions on blockchain adoption: a vignette experiment [Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(3), pages 343-357.
    6. Andrew Crane & Genevieve LeBaron & Jean Allain & Laya Behbahani, 2019. "Governance gaps in eradicating forced labor: From global to domestic supply chains," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 86-106, March.
    7. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Dimitrios Kalfas & Efstratios Loizou & Olympia Papaevangelou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2023. "Smart Sustainable Marketing and Emerging Technologies: Evidence from the Greek Business Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Malanski, Priscila Duarte & Schiavi, Sandra & Dedieu, Benoît & Damasceno, Julio Cesar, 2022. "Labor in agrifood value chains: a scientometric review from Scopus," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(3), March.
    9. Christine Jeske, 2020. "People refusing to be wealth: What happens when South African workers are denied access to “belonging in”," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), pages 253-266, June.
    10. Ravi S. Srivastava, 2016. "Myth and reality of labour flexibility in India," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 59(1), pages 1-38, March.
    11. Walaa Wahid ElKelish*, 2023. "Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 203-226, June.
    12. Mengyi Zhang & Peter Dannenberg, 2022. "Opportunities and Challenges of Indigenous Food Plant Farmers in Integrating into Agri-Food Value Chains in Cape Town," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Johanna Katharina Schenner, 2018. "The Governance of the Horticultural Supply Chain in the United Kingdom: A Source of Forced Labour?," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(1), pages 29-54.
    14. Renata Aguayo Lopes da Silva & Renato Cesar Gonçalves Robert & Thomas Purfürst, 2023. "How Is the Forest Sector’s Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Being Addressed? A Systematic Review of the Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Alessandra Mezzadri, 2016. "The informalization of capital and interlocking in labour contracting networks," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(2), pages 124-139, April.
    16. Elsa Underhill & Dimitria Groutsis & Diane Broek & Malcolm Rimmer, 2018. "Migration Intermediaries and Codes of Conduct: Temporary Migrant Workers in Australian Horticulture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 675-689, December.
    17. Yassir M. Abbas & Nasir Shafiq & Galal Fares & Montasir Osman & Mohammad Iqbal Khan & Jamal M. Khatib, 2023. "Strength Iso-Responses of Shear-Deficient Ultra-High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Helwing Veronique & Verfürth Philip & Franz Martin, 2023. "Trucking (un)limited – the impact of digital platforms on labour in production networks of logistics," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 67(4), pages 177-188, December.
    19. Johanna Katharina Schenner, 2017. "The Gangmaster Licensing Authority: An Institution Able to Tackle Labour Exploitation?," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 19(3), pages 357-381.
    20. María G. Lira & James P. Robson & Daniel J. Klooster, 2022. "Commons, global markets and small-scale family enterprises: the case of mezcal production in Oaxaca, Mexico," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 937-952, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:131:y:2021:i:c:p:112-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.