IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbfina/v92y2018icp51-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedge fund vs. non-hedge fund institutional demand and the book-to-market effect

Author

Listed:
  • Caglayan, Mustafa Onur
  • Celiker, Umut
  • Sonaer, Gokhan

Abstract

Recent studies have documented that institutional investors trade contrary to the predictions of the book-to market anomaly. We examine whether a prominent sub-group of institutional investors, namely hedge funds, differ from other institutions in terms of their trading behavior with respect to the book-to-market effect. We find that hedge funds significantly alter their trading preferences with respect to growth and value stocks, after book-to-market values become public information. More importantly, we show that hedge funds are better able to identify overpriced growth stocks compared to other institutions. Our results contribute to the literature on institutional investors’ trading with respect to stock return anomalies.

Suggested Citation

  • Caglayan, Mustafa Onur & Celiker, Umut & Sonaer, Gokhan, 2018. "Hedge fund vs. non-hedge fund institutional demand and the book-to-market effect," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 51-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:51-66
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.04.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426618300943
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.04.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alldredge, Dallin M. & Caglayan, Mustafa O. & Celiker, Umut, 2022. "How do investors trade R&D-intensive Stocks? Evidence from hedge funds and other institutional investors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Yu, Lin & Liu, Xiaoquan & Fung, Hung-Gay & Leung, Wai Kin, 2020. "Size and value effects in high-tech industries: The role of R&D investment," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    3. Joshua van Vuuren & Gary van Vuuren, 2022. "Detecting Investment Fraud Using the Bias Ratio," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Book-to-market effect; Institutional demand; Hedge funds;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:51-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.