IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ireced/v35y2020ics1477388020300190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of competences in postgraduate studies of finance: A project-based learning (PBL) case study

Author

Listed:
  • Parrado-Martínez, Purificación
  • Sánchez-Andújar, Sonia

Abstract

The methodological paradigm advanced in European higher education during recent decades focuses on the concept of ‘competence’ to achieve student employability. This professionalization of education requires more flexible and active teaching-learning contexts. This paper presents an empirical research into the application of project-based learning (PBL) in postgraduate studies of finance in the University of Jaén (Spain). Considering the important role that students’ perspective plays in their own motivation and performance, we pursue three main objectives. First, we aim to analyse students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of this methodology to improve some key competences for student employability. Second, we explore whether the perceived utility of these competences changes after the PBL experiment. Finally, we aim to explore students’ opinion about the usefulness, advantages and disadvantages of this method. Our findings support the perceived effectiveness of PBL for improving teamwork, communication, creativity, organization and information management competences. In addition, results show that students were highly satisfied, emphasizing the superiority of PBL in comparison with traditional learning methods, and its usefulness for learning about financing sources and to making contact with the business world.

Suggested Citation

  • Parrado-Martínez, Purificación & Sánchez-Andújar, Sonia, 2020. "Development of competences in postgraduate studies of finance: A project-based learning (PBL) case study," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:35:y:2020:i:c:s1477388020300190
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2020.100192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388020300190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iree.2020.100192?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricard Rigall-I-Torrent, 2011. "Using problem-based learning for introducing producer theory and market structure in intermediate microeconomics," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 10(1), pages 14-28.
    2. Schweitzer-Krah, Eva & Engartner, Tim, 2019. "Students’ perception of the pluralism debate in economics: Evidence from a quantitative survey among German universities," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Enrique Arias & Virginia Barba-Sánchez & Carmen Carrión & Rafael Casado, 2018. "Enhancing Entrepreneurship Education in a Master’s Degree in Computer Engineering: A Project-Based Learning Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Roach, Travis, 2014. "Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 74-84.
    5. John Cullen & Sue Richardson & Rona O'Brien, 2004. "Exploring the teaching potential of empirically-based case studies," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 251-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Xiaodan Zhou & Ling-Hsiu Chen & Chin-Ling Chen, 2019. "Collaborative Learning by Teaching: A Pedagogy between Learner-Centered and Learner-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Rita A. Balaban & Donna B. Gilleskie & Uyen Tran, 2016. "A quantitative evaluation of the flipped classroom in a large lecture principles of economics course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 269-287, October.
    4. Julen Izagirre-Olaizola & Jon Morandeira-Arca, 2020. "Business Management Teaching-Learning Processes in Times of Pandemic: Flipped Classroom at A Distance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon, 2010. "Teaching with Case Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Accounting Lecturers' Experiences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 555-567.
    6. Becker, Ralf & Proud, Steven, 2018. "Flipping quantitative tutorials," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 59-73.
    7. Gourley, Patrick, 2021. "Back to basics: How reading the text and taking notes improves learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    8. Grogan, Kelly A., 2017. "Will this be on the test? How exam structure affects perceptions of innovative assignments in a masters of science microeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Fritz Dresselhaus & Jessika A. Bohlmann & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2015. "Assessing the impact of just-in-time methodology, in-lecture activities, and tutor-assisted post-lecture activities in the course experience of first year students in Economics at the University of Pr," Working Papers 562, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    10. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    11. S. Cook & C. Elliott, 2016. "Innovations in Economics Education: An Introduction to Economic and Econometric Tools for Teaching and Learning," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1180038-118, December.
    12. Hua-Xu Zhong & Po-Sheng Chiu & Chin-Feng Lai, 2021. "Effects of the Use of CDIO Engineering Design in a Flipped Programming Course on Flow Experience, Cognitive Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2010. "Developing skills via work placements in accounting: Student and employer views," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 89-108.
    14. Jin Su Jeong & David González-Gómez, 2021. "Flipped-OCN Method in Mathematics Learning to Analyze the Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Marlous Blankesteijn & Bart Bossink & Peter Sijde, 2021. "Science-based entrepreneurship education as a means for university-industry technology transfer," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 779-808, June.
    16. Pavel Strach & Irena Stejskalova, 2015. "New Didactic Approaches in Accounting: Moving Beyond the Calculation Exercise," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 2304424, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    17. Olitsky, Neal H. & Cosgrove, Sarah B., 2016. "The better blend? Flipping the principles of microeconomics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-11.
    18. Ata Taşpolat & Fezile Özdamli & Emrah Soykan, 2021. "Programming Language Training With the Flipped Classroom Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    19. Carlos J. Asarta & Frank G. Mixon Jr., 2019. "Publishing and Scholarship in Economic Education: A Catalog and Assessment," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 64(2), pages 269-281, October.
    20. Pezzino, Mario, 2018. "Online assessment, adaptive feedback and the importance of visual learning for students. The advantages, with a few caveats, of using MapleTA," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 11-28.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Project-based learning; Competences; Students’ perceptions; Higher education; Finance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:35:y:2020:i:c:s1477388020300190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.