IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v44y2009i3p409-414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles under distortion risk measures

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuang, Weiwei
  • Chen, Zijin
  • Hu, Taizhong

Abstract

In the literature, orderings of optimal allocations of policy limits and deductibles were established by maximizing the expected utility of wealth of the policyholder. In this paper, by applying the bivariate characterizations of stochastic ordering relations, we reconsider the same model and derive some new refined results on orderings of optimal allocations of policy limits and deductibles with respect to the family of distortion risk measures from the viewpoint of the policyholder. Both loss severities and loss frequencies are considered. Special attention is given to the optimization criteria of the family of distortion risk measures with concave distortions and with only increasing distortions. Most of the results presented in this paper can be applied to some particular distortion risk measures. The results complement and extend the main results in Cheung [Cheung, K.C., 2007. Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 41, 291-382] and Hua and Cheung [Hua, L., Cheung, K.C., 2008a. Stochastic orders of scalar products with applications. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 42, 865-872].

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuang, Weiwei & Chen, Zijin & Hu, Taizhong, 2009. "Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles under distortion risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 409-414, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:409-414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-6687(08)00170-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheung, Ka Chun, 2007. "Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 382-391, November.
    2. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 3-33, August.
    3. Hua, Lei & Cheung, Ka Chun, 2008. "Stochastic orders of scalar products with applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 865-872, June.
    4. Denneberg, Dieter, 1990. "Premium Calculation: Why Standard Deviation Should be Replaced by Absolute Deviation1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 181-190, November.
    5. Wang, Shaun, 1996. "Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium Density," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 71-92, May.
    6. Hua, Lei & Cheung, Ka Chun, 2008. "Worst allocations of policy limits and deductibles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 93-98, August.
    7. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manesh, Sirous Fathi & Khaledi, Baha-Eldin, 2015. "Allocations of policy limits and ordering relations for aggregate remaining claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 9-14.
    2. Cai, Jun & Wei, Wei, 2014. "Some new notions of dependence with applications in optimal allocation problems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 200-209.
    3. Wei Wei, 2018. "Properties of Stochastic Arrangement Increasing and Their Applications in Allocation Problems," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Yinping You & Xiaohu Li, 2017. "Most unfavorable deductibles and coverage limits for multiple random risks with Archimedean copulas," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 259(1), pages 485-501, December.
    5. Cheung, Ka Chun, 2009. "Applications of conditional comonotonicity to some optimization problems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 89-93, August.
    6. Li, Chen & Li, Xiaohu, 2017. "Ordering optimal deductible allocations for stochastic arrangement increasing risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 31-40.
    7. Xu, Maochao & Hu, Taizhong, 2012. "Stochastic comparisons of capital allocations with applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 293-298.
    8. Yinping You & Xiaohu Li & Rui Fang, 2021. "On coverage limits and deductibles for SAI loss severities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 297(1), pages 341-357, February.
    9. Zhang, Yiying & Cheung, Ka Chun, 2020. "On the increasing convex order of generalized aggregation of dependent random variables," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 61-69.
    10. Li, Xiaohu & You, Yinping, 2012. "On allocation of upper limits and deductibles with dependent frequencies and comonotonic severities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 423-429.
    11. Qi Feng & J. George Shanthikumar, 2018. "Arrangement Increasing Resource Allocation," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 935-955, September.
    12. Lu, ZhiYi & Meng, LiLi, 2011. "Stochastic comparisons for allocations of policy limits and deductibles with applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 338-343, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manesh, Sirous Fathi & Khaledi, Baha-Eldin & Dhaene, Jan, 2016. "Optimal allocation of policy deductibles for exchangeable risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 87-92.
    2. Maria Mercè Claramunt & Maite Màrmol, 2020. "Refundable deductible insurance," Working Papers hal-02909299, HAL.
    3. Cheung, Ka Chun, 2009. "Applications of conditional comonotonicity to some optimization problems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 89-93, August.
    4. Yinping You & Xiaohu Li & Rui Fang, 2021. "On coverage limits and deductibles for SAI loss severities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 297(1), pages 341-357, February.
    5. Choo, Weihao & de Jong, Piet, 2015. "The tradeoff insurance premium as a two-sided generalisation of the distortion premium," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 238-246.
    6. López-Díaz, Miguel & Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2012. "On the Lp-metric between a probability distribution and its distortion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 257-264.
    7. Tsanakas, Andreas, 2009. "To split or not to split: Capital allocation with convex risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 268-277, April.
    8. Halim Zeghdoudi & Meriem Bouhadjar & Mohamed Riad Remita, 2014. "On Stochastic Orders and its applications : Policy limits and Deductibles," Papers 1411.1609, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    9. Choo, Weihao & de Jong, Piet, 2016. "Insights to systematic risk and diversification across a joint probability distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 142-150.
    10. Laeven, Roger J. A. & Goovaerts, Marc J., 2004. "An optimization approach to the dynamic allocation of economic capital," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 299-319, October.
    11. Debora Daniela Escobar & Georg Ch. Pflug, 2020. "The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 771-794, September.
    12. Furman, Edward & Wang, Ruodu & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2017. "Gini-type measures of risk and variability: Gini shortfall, capital allocations, and heavy-tailed risks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 70-84.
    13. Ruodu Wang & Ričardas Zitikis, 2021. "An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1413-1429, March.
    14. Hurlimann, Werner, 2006. "A note on generalized distortion risk measures," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 267-272, December.
    15. Tsanakas, Andreas, 2008. "Risk measurement in the presence of background risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 520-528, April.
    16. Miryana Grigorova, 2011. "Stochastic dominance with respect to a capacity and risk measures," Working Papers hal-00639667, HAL.
    17. Hu, Taizhong & Chen, Ouxiang, 2020. "On a family of coherent measures of variability," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 173-182.
    18. Zhang, Yiying & Cheung, Ka Chun, 2020. "On the increasing convex order of generalized aggregation of dependent random variables," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 61-69.
    19. Wei Wang & Huifu Xu, 2023. "Preference robust state-dependent distortion risk measure on act space and its application in optimal decision making," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-51, December.
    20. Grigorova Miryana, 2014. "Stochastic dominance with respect to a capacity and risk measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 31(3-4), pages 1-37, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:409-414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.