IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v118y2014i3p273-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential impact of removing general practice boundaries in England: A policy analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mays, Nicholas
  • Tan, Stefanie
  • Eastmure, Elizabeth
  • Erens, Bob
  • Lagarde, Mylene
  • Wright, Michael

Abstract

In 2015, the UK government plans to widen patient choice of general practitioner (GP) to improve access through the voluntary removal of practice boundaries in the English NHS. This follows a 12-month pilot in four areas where volunteer GP practices accepted patients from outside their boundaries. Using evidence from the pilot evaluation, we discuss the likely impact of this policy change on patient experience, responsiveness and equity of access. Patients reported positive experiences but in a brief pilot in four areas, it was not possible to assess potential demand, the impact on quality of care or health outcomes. In the rollout, policymakers and commissioners will need to balance the access needs of local residents against the demands of those coming into the area. The rollout should include full information for prospective patients; monitoring and understanding patterns of patient movement between practices and impact on practice capacity; and ensuring the timely transfer of clinical information between providers. This policy has the potential to improve choice and convenience for a sub-group of the population at lower marginal costs than new provision. However, there are simpler, less costly, ways of improving convenience, such as extending opening hours or offering alternatives to face-to-face consultation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mays, Nicholas & Tan, Stefanie & Eastmure, Elizabeth & Erens, Bob & Lagarde, Mylene & Wright, Michael, 2014. "Potential impact of removing general practice boundaries in England: A policy analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 273-278.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:118:y:2014:i:3:p:273-278
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851014002826
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Stefanie & Mays, Nicholas, 2014. "Impact of initiatives to improve access to, and choice of, primary and urgent care in England: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 304-315.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giulia Rioli & Silvia Ferrari & Claire Henderson & Riccardo Vandelli & Giacomo Galli & Alessandro Minarini & Gian Maria Galeazzi, 2020. "Users’ choice and change of allocated primary mental health professional in community-based mental health services: A scoping review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(4), pages 373-381, June.
    2. Gravelle, Hugh & Liu, Dan & Propper, Carol & Santos, Rita, 2019. "Spatial competition and quality: Evidence from the English family doctor market," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Empel, Giovanni & Gravelle, Hugh & Santos, Rita, 2023. "Does quality affect choice of family physician? Evidence from patients changing general practice without changing address," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baier, Natalie & Geissler, Alexander & Bech, Mickael & Bernstein, David & Cowling, Thomas E. & Jackson, Terri & van Manen, Johan & Rudkjøbing, Andreas & Quentin, Wilm, 2019. "Emergency and urgent care systems in Australia, Denmark, England, France, Germany and the Netherlands – Analyzing organization, payment and reforms," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 1-10.
    2. Ugolini, Cristina & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Mammi, Irene & Donatini, Andrea & Fiorentini, Gianluca, 2016. "Dealing with minor illnesses: The link between primary care characteristics and Walk-in Centres’ attendances," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 72-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:118:y:2014:i:3:p:273-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.