IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v100y2011i2-3p144-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Satisfaction of patients: A right to health indicator?

Author

Listed:
  • Mpinga, Emmanuel Kabengele
  • Chastonay, Philippe

Abstract

Background Right to health indicators have been subject to debate. Indeed, inadequate monitoring or reporting by states, missing or contradicting data as well as a lack of consensus on what is an appropriate right to health indicator call for new approaches and new ideas in this field. One right to health indicator might be patient satisfaction, a widely collected indicator, yet not always beyond bias nor adequately monitored, neither well used.Methods We compared, applying the concept analysis of Rodgers, key-items of patient satisfaction surveys/reviews to key concepts of right to health as developed in the General Comment 14/2000 of the ICESCR. Inclusion criteria of the selected patient satisfaction papers were: number of citations in Scholar Google, various care settings, various cultural contexts, methodological reviews and time frame.Results High correspondence between recommended or collected patient satisfaction items and patients' rights as defined by the GC 14/2000 were observed, i.e. accessibility of care (information, financial, physical), availability (services, programs, personal), acceptability (cultural, gender-related), quality of care (scientific, medical).Conclusion Patient satisfaction could prove a useful right to health indicator.

Suggested Citation

  • Mpinga, Emmanuel Kabengele & Chastonay, Philippe, 2011. "Satisfaction of patients: A right to health indicator?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(2-3), pages 144-150, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:100:y:2011:i:2-3:p:144-150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(10)00328-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Viotti & Claudio Giovanni Cortese & Jacopo Garlasco & Erika Rainero & Ifeoma Nneka Emelurumonye & Stefano Passi & Flavio Boraso & Maria Michela Gianino, 2020. "The Buffering Effect of Humanity of Care in the Relationship between Patient Satisfaction and Waiting Time: A Cross-sectional Study in an Emergency Department," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Joan Costa-Font & Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2021. "Does Devolution Alter the Choice of Public versus Private Health Care?," Working Papers 1291, Barcelona School of Economics.
    3. Costa-Font, Joan & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada, 2022. "Does devolution influence the choice and quality of public (vs private) health care?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 632-653.
    4. Joan Costa-Font & Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2019. "Regional Decentralisation and the Demand for Public Health Care," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2019-41, FEDEA.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:100:y:2011:i:2-3:p:144-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.